RE: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon

2002-03-06 Thread Matthias Fischer

Sorry, I didn't mean to misinterprete your words - and thanks for your quick
responses.

I'll change to the Cocoon user list (I would have to subscribe to the Cocoon
dev list sepcifically to discuss this topic with you...)

Matthias


-Original Message-
From: Morrison, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:39 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon


Ha - I didn't *say* that there *were* any missing features, I just said
if there *were* we'd be happy to add them.  Please don't read something
I didn't write...

What limitations are you refering too?  I'm sure any suggestions would
be welcome (though if Cocoon specific we should change lists...).

J.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon

2002-03-06 Thread Morrison, John

Ha - I didn't *say* that there *were* any missing features, I just said
if there *were* we'd be happy to add them.  Please don't read something
I didn't write...

What limitations are you refering too?  I'm sure any suggestions would
be welcome (though if Cocoon specific we should change lists...).

J.

> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 06 March 2002 10:28 am
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon
> 
> 
> I don't think missing features are a problem in themselves. 
> However, yours
> is the first definitive assertion from a developer that those features
> mentioned by me actually don't exist.
> 
> I'm sure my company will continue to use Cocoon with its - 
> not too extensive
> and, by now, known to us - limitations for Web solutions, and 
> FOP without
> Cocoon for mere print projects. For these projects it would be really
> user-friendly to have a FOP GUI. (For this reason I wrote to 
> the FOP dev
> list, not to the Cocoon list.)
> 
> I reckon such an interface would not reduce the merit of 
> Cocoon or Cocoon
> programmers for those (numerous) features that have been implemented.
> 
> 
> Matthias
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Morrison, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:04 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon
> 
> 
> If you could help I'm sure the Cocoon community would be pleased to
> add any missing functionality.
> 
> J.
> 
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Matthias Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 06 March 2002 9:53 am
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nicola Ken Barozzi
> > Subject: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon
> >
> >
> > Yes, despite tenacious tentatives we did not succeed in getting the
> > following to work properly in FOP 20.1 + Cocoon 2.0 (PDF output):
> > - hyphenation DE
> > - font embedding
> > - Unicode output
> > The same features could be translated into PDFs without any
> > problems with
> > FOP as a stand-alone solution.
> >
> > Replies and suggestions from the lists were considered.
> > If we are mistaken in our assumption, that these features 
> are not yet
> > completely implemented in Cocoon 2.0, we would be happy.
> >
> >
> > Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> ==
> =
> Information in this email and any attachments are 
> confidential, and may
> not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor 
> disclosed
> to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
> create any legally binding contract or other commitment 
> through the use
> of this email.
> 
> Experian Limited (registration number 653331).
> Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon

2002-03-06 Thread Matthias Fischer

I don't think missing features are a problem in themselves. However, yours
is the first definitive assertion from a developer that those features
mentioned by me actually don't exist.

I'm sure my company will continue to use Cocoon with its - not too extensive
and, by now, known to us - limitations for Web solutions, and FOP without
Cocoon for mere print projects. For these projects it would be really
user-friendly to have a FOP GUI. (For this reason I wrote to the FOP dev
list, not to the Cocoon list.)

I reckon such an interface would not reduce the merit of Cocoon or Cocoon
programmers for those (numerous) features that have been implemented.


Matthias


-Original Message-
From: Morrison, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:04 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon


If you could help I'm sure the Cocoon community would be pleased to
add any missing functionality.

J.

> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 06 March 2002 9:53 am
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nicola Ken Barozzi
> Subject: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon
>
>
> Yes, despite tenacious tentatives we did not succeed in getting the
> following to work properly in FOP 20.1 + Cocoon 2.0 (PDF output):
> - hyphenation DE
> - font embedding
> - Unicode output
> The same features could be translated into PDFs without any
> problems with
> FOP as a stand-alone solution.
>
> Replies and suggestions from the lists were considered.
> If we are mistaken in our assumption, that these features are not yet
> completely implemented in Cocoon 2.0, we would be happy.
>
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


===
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.

Experian Limited (registration number 653331).
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon

2002-03-06 Thread Morrison, John

If you could help I'm sure the Cocoon community would be pleased to
add any missing functionality.

J.

> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 06 March 2002 9:53 am
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nicola Ken Barozzi
> Subject: FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon
> 
> 
> Yes, despite tenacious tentatives we did not succeed in getting the
> following to work properly in FOP 20.1 + Cocoon 2.0 (PDF output):
> - hyphenation DE
> - font embedding
> - Unicode output
> The same features could be translated into PDFs without any 
> problems with
> FOP as a stand-alone solution.
> 
> Replies and suggestions from the lists were considered.
> If we are mistaken in our assumption, that these features are not yet
> completely implemented in Cocoon 2.0, we would be happy.
> 
> 
> Matthias
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


===
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.

Experian Limited (registration number 653331).  
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




FOP vs. FOP+Cocoon

2002-03-06 Thread Matthias Fischer

Yes, despite tenacious tentatives we did not succeed in getting the
following to work properly in FOP 20.1 + Cocoon 2.0 (PDF output):
- hyphenation DE
- font embedding
- Unicode output
The same features could be translated into PDFs without any problems with
FOP as a stand-alone solution.

Replies and suggestions from the lists were considered.
If we are mistaken in our assumption, that these features are not yet
completely implemented in Cocoon 2.0, we would be happy.


Matthias



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]