Message -
From: Jim Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 11:01 PM
Subject: RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression
Hey Eric:
Been working with the patched stuff on and off all day -- still looks
great!
Attached is a rather junky macintosh-based jpg
are not all that huge.
Thanks again!
jw
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression
Jim,
I found the bug. I imagine this isn't the last time something like this will
come
Eric:
Latest patch does seem to solve the current header problem quite nicely.
Thanks!
jw
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression
Jim,
I found the bug. I
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression
Jim,
If you could please email me one of those jpegs it is erroring off on I'll
look into the reasons. A fix shouldn't be too hard. I forbgot all about
those
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression
Wow!
That works like a charm! Thanks a lot, Eric.
In my preliminary tests, Eric's patch moved a pdf with 6 heavily
compressed
jpgs from over 950 K to just over 50K! Rendering times seem
I'm going to give this a try straight away!
Thanks a lot.
jw
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 5:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] JPG Compression
Attached is the diff for the patch. This is going against the
