More specifically, the header from Photoshop 6.0 for Windows seems to work
the most reliably. Other Photoshop versions will sometimes give the error.

I've yet to install the latest update, but will do so, and test. I'll let
you know how it works out.

Otherwise, the patch seems to be holding up quite well. In an existing FOP
install, we've passed close to 80 or so different images through, all of
which worked very well.

I can't speak to Daniel Pfuhl's issue of longer XSL documents as ours, while
fairly graphics intensive, are only 4-8 pages in length, and the XSL
documents are not all that huge.

Thanks again!


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression


I found the bug. I imagine this isn't the last time something like this will
come up. JPEGs use a fairly simple header setup to store pertinent
information in the image. The JPEG standard says the image width, height and
color depth should be stored in the FFC0 header the jpeg you have stored the
info in a FFC2 header which I had not heard of. It seems there are many
flavors of jpeg so little fixes like this may be happening for a while.
Attached is a new which will fix the problem. If you're
interested the change was made on line 81.

-Eric Dalquist

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 11:01 PM
Subject: RE: [PATCH] JPG Compression

> Hey Eric:
> Been working with the patched stuff on and off all day -- still looks
> Attached is a rather junky macintosh-based jpg that demonstrates the
> problem. Let me know if you get a fix. Either way, thanks again for the
> patch!
> jw
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 4:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] JPG Compression

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to