Re: Markers in areas

2003-02-22 Thread Peter B. West
Arved Sandstrom wrote: Joerg, you can freely get rid of that stuff. I originally introduced it when I had more faith in the spec, and thought that the authors knew what they were talking about when it came to to their math. Specifically, the lineage pairs is an abstract concept that I can see no

Re: Markers in areas

2003-02-22 Thread Peter B. West
Arved Sandstrom wrote: They are not connected concepts, Mark. I originally put in the code for lineage pairs, and also started the implementation for markers. So I can assure you that they are completely unrelated. For what it's worth, subsequent contributors have significantly improved on marker

RE: Markers in areas

2003-02-22 Thread Arved Sandstrom
. In this case the experts are the customers; we have a confused spec because they thought they were the programmers and writers as well. Arved -Original Message- From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 22, 2003 8:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Markers in areas

Re: Markers in areas

2003-02-18 Thread J.Pietschmann
Arved Sandstrom wrote: Joerg, you can freely get rid of that stuff. Great! Anybody out there bothering to profile the new code? Two objects less created per Area, this should be noticable! J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe,

RE: Markers in areas

2003-02-18 Thread Mark C. Allman
: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Markers in areas Arved Sandstrom wrote: Joerg, you can freely get rid of that stuff. Great! Anybody out there bothering to profile the new code? Two objects less created per Area, this should be noticable! J.Pietschmann

RE: Markers in areas

2003-02-18 Thread Arved Sandstrom
, and replaced with plain language. Arved -Original Message- From: Mark C. Allman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 18, 2003 5:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Markers in areas ... but markers will continue to work as per the XSLFO spec, correct? We depend

Re: Markers in areas

2003-02-18 Thread J.Pietschmann
Mark C. Allman wrote: ... but markers will continue to work as per the XSLFO spec, correct? There are restrictions (and have always been). Look into the CHANGES file. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

RE: Markers in areas

2003-02-17 Thread Arved Sandstrom
Joerg, you can freely get rid of that stuff. I originally introduced it when I had more faith in the spec, and thought that the authors knew what they were talking about when it came to to their math. Specifically, the lineage pairs is an abstract concept that I can see no implementation use for.