Re: [FW:] RE: 0.20.5 release

2003-07-08 Thread J.Pietschmann 
Thomas Sporbeck wrote:
 It might be a fundamental decision if FOP is a kind of "toolbox" for
developers or if it should be an "out of the box-product" for nearly everyone
It is Open Source. If you find issues and create patches, send
them in. Every contribution is welcome.
J.Pietschmann



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [FW:] RE: 0.20.5 release

2003-07-08 Thread Thomas Sporbeck 
I might be wrong, but I think most users of FOP are using it 
server-side, where resources (especially memory) are more readily 
available. This might explain your problems, I think little energy has 
been spent to optimize FOP's memory requirements.

Yes, I agree. But some companies (banking, assurance etc.) have a quite high level of 
security on their servers - in fact that high that an external administrator has no 
change to install any  piece of software running on a server without some months of 
testing (and that tests may fail because of a memory lack on the workstations...).

Thomas Sporbeck


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [FW:] RE: 0.20.5 release

2003-07-08 Thread Felix Breuer 
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 14:31, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> I might be wrong, but I think most users of FOP are using it 
> server-side, where resources (especially memory) are more readily 

I don't know about most users, but I am using FOP client-side since I do
not have a server.

Felix


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [FW:] RE: 0.20.5 release

2003-07-08 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz 
Le Mardi, 8 juil 2003, à 10:14 Europe/Zurich, Thomas Sporbeck a écrit :
...It might be a fundamental decision if FOP is a kind of "toolbox" 
for developers or if it should be an "out of the box-product" for 
nearly everyone - I think there's so much good ideas in it that 
everyone should be able to use it
I might be wrong, but I think most users of FOP are using it 
server-side, where resources (especially memory) are more readily 
available. This might explain your problems, I think little energy has 
been spent to optimize FOP's memory requirements.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]