Hmm, good question. How is "punt" for an answer?
Seriously, that's probably another case of delayed evaluation. Though I
think the issue concerns the descendants of "marker" and not the
properties on "marker" itself which are said to be ignored.
This is certainly not handled correctly as it stands
Karen,
Thanks for this detailed info. What do you do about "ems" lengths in a
marker?
Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Expressions involving "em" units which are relative to
>font-size _are_ resolved during the FO tree building however.
>
-
