Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25828] - [PATCH] fop.sh/bat should use java.endorsed.dirs

2004-08-10 Thread Glen Mazza
I think Simon meant 1.4.2 (*not* 1.4), which is more
correct, I believe.  I think he had even shown earlier
that the ones we distribute with FOP won't work with
FOP, while the ones already distributed with the SDK
1.4.2 will.

Glen

--- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > There have not been complaints from users.
> Apparently FOP works fine with the
> > default XML parser and XSLT processor in java 1.4.
> 
> Uh, well, this is just plain wrong. There have been
> *lots* of complaints
> about a slew of Xalan problems and a few Xerces bugs
> in the various
> 1.4 JDKs released over time, and they all got the
> stock response
> "upgrade your JDK or put the most recent
> Xalan/Xerces jar into
> lib/endorsed," which seemed to work pretty well.
> 
> There ought to be a general way to set JVM options
> for fop.sh/fop.bat
> though, not only for setting java.endorsed.dirs.
> 
> J.Pietschmann
> 
> 



Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25828] - [PATCH] fop.sh/bat should use java.endorsed.dirs

2004-08-10 Thread J.Pietschmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have not been complaints from users. Apparently FOP works fine with the
default XML parser and XSLT processor in java 1.4.
Uh, well, this is just plain wrong. There have been *lots* of complaints
about a slew of Xalan problems and a few Xerces bugs in the various
1.4 JDKs released over time, and they all got the stock response
"upgrade your JDK or put the most recent Xalan/Xerces jar into
lib/endorsed," which seemed to work pretty well.
There ought to be a general way to set JVM options for fop.sh/fop.bat
though, not only for setting java.endorsed.dirs.
J.Pietschmann