--- Finn Bock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We've been doing the same with PR_ (properties)
> and
> > FO_ (FO's) for quite some time.
>
> To avoid a name conflict somewhere.
>
Yes, I was wondering why you didn't originally do that
for the enumeration constants as well. I like their
self-d
[Glen]
2.) Appended EN_ to enumeration constants to
[J.Pietschmann]
Yuk. Having a large number of identifiers in the
same scope with
an identical prefix isn't very good for
autocompletion both in
Emacs and Eclipse.
[Glen]
We've been doing the same with PR_ (properties) and
FO_ (FO's) for quite so
--- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > gmazza 2004/11/24 13:07:31
> > 2.) Appended EN_ to enumeration constants to
> make them better S&R'able throughout app.
>
> Yuk. Having a large number of identifiers in the
> same scope with
> an identical prefix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmazza 2004/11/24 13:07:31
2.) Appended EN_ to enumeration constants to make them better S&R'able
throughout app.
Yuk. Having a large number of identifiers in the same scope with
an identical prefix isn't very good for autocompletion both in
Emacs and Eclipse. I als
gmazza 2003/12/22 13:37:44
Modified:.build.xml
src/codegen fo-property-mapping.xsl properties.xsl
src/java/org/apache/fop/datatypes CondLength.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/fo FObj.java Property.java
PropertyLis
gmazza 2003/11/05 15:48:47
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties CommonBackground.java
CommonBorderAndPadding.java
src/java/org/apache/fop/traits LayoutProps.java
SpaceVal.java
Log:
toString() methods implemente
