; !!! TODO:
SVGOMSVGElement.getViewBox()");
}
Hope that someone can implement it soon.
Jeroen de Zwart
- Original Message -
From: "Maring, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:04 PM
Subject: RE: svg probs with 0.19.0 and 0.2
tes fill-rule:evenodd
-Original Message-
From: Michel Lehon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: svg probs with 0.19.0
I thought FOP 0.19.0 + used Batik for SVG.
Am I Wrong ?
Michel.
> -Original Message
I thought FOP 0.19.0 + used Batik for SVG.
Am I Wrong ?
Michel.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex McLintock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 August, 2001 10:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: svg probs with 0.19.0
>
>
> --- "Mar
--- "Maring, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure why this is happening. Maybe somebody can help me? My svg
> gets improperly generated through FOP 0.19.0 (I have not tried others). The
> viewBox seems to be ignored and fill-rule:evenodd does not work. Is this a
> Batik thing? W
Steve,
With the latest version (0.20.1) I get the same result with the awt
previewer and the pdf output. THis means that at least the even-odd problem
is fixed.
As for the viewBox - I'm not really sure how it should work and applies
when embedding inside xsl-fo. If you simply need to change the si
I'm not sure why this is happening. Maybe somebody can help me? My svg
gets improperly generated through FOP 0.19.0 (I have not tried others). The
viewBox seems to be ignored and fill-rule:evenodd does not work. Is this a
Batik thing? When I run the rasterizer in Batik 1.0 it seems to underst
