To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 pr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1 pr
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
We need to finish the API discussion once and for all, especially since
we need to get another release out of the door soon. I'm happy with the
API as described in [1] and implemented in the Temp_API_Finalization
branch, except for one item handled separately below. Thanks
We need to finish the API discussion once and for all, especially since
we need to get another release out of the door soon. I'm happy with the
API as described in [1] and implemented in the Temp_API_Finalization
branch, except for one item handled separately below. Thanks to Simon
for cleaning up
On 21.03.2006 16:01:40 Chris Bowditch wrote:
> > Removing the reflection code from Jess' example, it looks like this:
> >
> > Fop fop = new Fop("application/pdf");
> > fop.setOutputStream(out);
> > DefaultHandler defaultHandler = fop.getDefaultHandler();
> >
> > With the revised API
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 21.03.2006 16:01:40 Chris Bowditch wrote:
Whats the proposed replacement for setOutputStream() before I decide on
my vote here? (The Wiki shows examples with it in)
Whoops, the example wasn't updated. Just done that:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ApiDe
These changes look like a move in the right direction... Glad to hear
we're nearing another release again!
On Mar 21, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
We need to finish the API discussion once and for all, especially
since
we need to get another release out of the door soon. I'm happy
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:23:26PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> We need to finish the API discussion once and for all, especially since
> we need to get another release out of the door soon. I'm happy with the
> API as described in [1] and implemented in the Temp_API_Finalization
> branch, excep
Andreas, Matthias,
I've digged a little more into the code and would like to share what
I've done and tested and so far.
I've added at the end of
PageSequenceLayoutManager.PageBreaker.finishPart:
if (getCurrentPage().getSimplePageMaster().getPageHeight().getEnum()
== Constants.EN_INDEFINIT
