DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39184] - soft page break on new line

2006-04-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39184. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Generalized Knuth-Plass Linebreaking Algorithm

2006-04-04 Thread Chris Bowditch
Simon Pepping wrote: Hello, Some time ago Manuel Mall pointed out a number of problems with linebreaking in FOP. Specifically, there are some hard to solve problems with suppression of whitespace before a linebreak. This is excellent news Simon. I was a little concerned when Manuel pointed

Re: Generalized Knuth-Plass Linebreaking Algorithm

2006-04-04 Thread Luca Furini
Simon Pepping wrote: [...] See http://www.leverkruid.nl/GKPLinebreaking/index.html. Please, let me know what you think of it. I'm going to read it carefully, it seems very interesting! Regards Luca

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-fop (in module xml-fop) failed

2006-04-04 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1

Building fop and batik

2006-04-04 Thread Peter West
I noticed some recent commits that mentioned an xmlgraphics commons module. What's the state of play with this? My basic question is, what fop and batik trunk versions give a stable and compatible build base? Is there a new subversion module? If so, will I need to add the commons module to

Re: Building fop and batik

2006-04-04 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 04.04.2006 15:50:09 Peter West wrote: I noticed some recent commits that mentioned an xmlgraphics commons module. What's the state of play with this? Finally picking up speed. I got serious about migrating components from Batik and FOP over to the new subproject. It is work in progress

Re: Building fop and batik

2006-04-04 Thread Peter West
Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 04.04.2006 15:50:09 Peter West wrote: I noticed some recent commits that mentioned an xmlgraphics commons module. What's the state of play with this? Finally picking up speed. I got serious about migrating components from Batik and FOP over to the new subproject. It

Re: Building fop and batik

2006-04-04 Thread Jeremias Maerki
The latest revision of FOP Trunk right before my next commit which will add Commons is 390222 (or date: everything before today). On 04.04.2006 16:51:59 Peter West wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 04.04.2006 15:50:09 Peter West wrote: I noticed some recent commits that mentioned an

[NOTICE] XML Graphics Commons is now a dependency of FOP Trunk

2006-04-04 Thread Jeremias Maerki
As announced, I've just committed the first batch of changes that now uses the newly migrated components in XML Graphics Commons. This already reduces the number of direct dependencies into Batik. Please notice the xmlgraphics-commons.jar in the lib directory. Don't forget to add it to the

Re: Generalized Knuth-Plass Linebreaking Algorithm

2006-04-04 Thread Manuel Mall
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 03:38, Simon Pepping wrote: Hello, snip/ Simon, very interesting approach to the problem. You obviously gave this quite a significant amount of thought. While your approach may simplify many Knuth sequences for the less common (or more convoluted) cases you clearly