On 09.05.2006 23:57:24 J.Pietschmann wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Attention: long post. :-)
[snip stuff which reminds me on reinventing TeX/DVI]
Using the page master name to map onto output media suggests that
different page flows could be printed on different media. Is this
correct?
On 09.05.2006 17:13:40 Chris Bowditch wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 09.05.2006 16:04:37 Chris Bowditch wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 09.05.2006 13:35:11 Chris Bowditch wrote:
snip/
This renderer configuration is still implemented as an extension. It's
just that the
I've just committed some changes which helps the Java2DRenderer narrow
the gap to the PDF and PS renderers. The remaining problems are:
- Font sizes are rounded down to the next integer when java.awt.Font
instances are instantiated.
- There's a coordinate system problem with block-containers which
Hi,
I read the long discussion between Jeremias and Chris, and Jörg's
note.
I do not like the idea of extension elements. I think, here I refer
back to a recent post by Glen about standard FO files. I like the idea
of a configuration file. Even a different configuration file for each
single
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
We can throw exceptions if no mapping is found, or the stuff is simply
printed on the default paper and people will quickly figure out that
they've done something wrong.
Well, having printed large documents on partly manually fed
special paper I know that even small
