DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40271] - auto table layout -- dirty draft

2006-08-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40271] - auto table layout -- dirty draft

2006-08-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [GSoC] Quick news

2006-08-22 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Ok, I'll need a couple of additional days to finish this work. Between a research paper and the actual code there is quite a gap... I had some hard time trying to find a proper design, dealing with special cases while factorizing the common code. In particular, deciding how to handle too-short/to

Re: [GSoC] Quick news

2006-08-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'm totally ok with that. What we got from your GSoC project is worth a lot, not forgetting that we got someone new who really understands our layout engine. I think you can be proud of what you accomplished. On 22.08.2006 18:13:51 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Ok, I'll need a couple of additional da

Re: [GSoC] Quick news

2006-08-22 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Aug 22, 2006, at 18:13, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Vincent, Ok, I'll need a couple of additional days to finish this work. Don't worry. Even if the patch didn't get finished before the end of GSoC, your Wiki is already quite a piece of work (as I'm sure your eventual patch will be).

Re: [GSoC] Quick news

2006-08-22 Thread Simon Pepping
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:22:22PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm totally ok with that. What we got from your GSoC project is worth a > lot, not forgetting that we got someone new who really understands our > layout engine. I think you can be proud of what you accomplished. I agree with that.

Re: [GT2006] Registration is open! Cocoon GetTogether 2006 (Oct 2-4,Amsterdam)

2006-08-22 Thread Simon Pepping
I registered for Monday. Regards, Simon On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Arje Cahn wrote: > Hi FOP folks, > > If you'd like to attent the Cocoon hackaton for FOP-hacking, please use the > normal registration form on www.cocoongt.org, deselect the "Cocoon > GetTogether" checkbox and se

Re: [GT2006] Registration is open! Cocoon GetTogether 2006 (Oct 2-4,Amsterdam)

2006-08-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I for both days. Arriving late Monday morning and leaving again Wednesday late morning. On 22.08.2006 20:42:02 Simon Pepping wrote: > I registered for Monday. > > Regards, Simon > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Arje Cahn wrote: > > Hi FOP folks, > > > > If you'd like to attent the

Q: Line-layout -> separating element-list creation / line-breaking

2006-08-22 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
Hi all, I've been doing some thinking myself about the separation between element-list creation and actual line-breaking, and went wandering through the related sources. Just checking here if my initial estimates are correct. At first glance, a possible separation seems already prepared

Re: svn commit: r433810 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo: FOText.java FObjMixed.java

2006-08-22 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Aug 23, 2006, at 02:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adelmelle Date: Tue Aug 22 17:10:20 2006 New Revision: 433810 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=433810&view=rev Log: Cleanup: removal of suspicious static in FOText Finally went ahead with this one as well. Up to now, I was a bit