+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43597.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi All,
Iam facing problem with arabic character display in PDF.
I have followed the steps given in
http://www.javaranch.com/journal/200409/CreatingMultipleLanguagePDFusingApacheFOP.html
But still the arabic text is displayed as # in the PDf template.
Kindly help me to resolve the
Hi,
I have a question for FO tree building specialists.
In TableFObj.addChildNode we have the following code:
if (!inMarker() child.getNameId() == FO_TABLE_CELL) {
/* update current column index for the table-body/table-row */
updateColumnIndex((TableCell) child);
}
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Oct 22, 2007, at 11:30, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent
Etc. My question: why is a special treatment needed when a table is
found as a descendent of a marker? My understanding is that if a whole
table is defined in a marker, then it doesn’t depend on the enclosing
table in which the
On Oct 22, 2007, at 18:30, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Etc. My question: why is a special treatment needed when a table is
found as a descendent of a marker? My understanding is that if a
whole
table is defined in a marker, then it doesn’t depend on the enclosing
table in which the marker is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
