Re: [Xmlgraphics-fop Wiki] Update of "ImageSupport/Status" by JeremiasMaerki

Salut Guillaume Wrong recipient perhaps? :-) To answer your question: The development happens in a temporary branch [1]. It'll soon be finished and merged into the Trunk. Some parts may go the XML Graphics Commons. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_ImagePackageRede

RE: [Xmlgraphics-fop Wiki] Update of "ImageSupport/Status" by JeremiasMaerki

Salut Patrice, Pour info, je viens de recevoir cette email. J'ai l'impression que l'équipe FOP fait pas mal de changement dans le chargement / traitement des images. je ne suis pas sûre si leur changement est dans foptrunk ou dans une autre branche. -Message d'origine- De : Apache Wiki

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44071] New: - endless loop in org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.ElementListUtils.removeLegalBreaks(..)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44071] - endless loop in org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.ElementListUtils.removeLegalBreaks(..)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44071] - endless loop in org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.ElementListUtils.removeLegalBreaks(..)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44071] - endless loop in org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.ElementListUtils.removeLegalBreaks(..)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38264] - Hyphenation does not play well with preserved linefeed-treatment or white-space-treatment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38264] - Hyphenation does not play well with preserved linefeed-treatment or white-space-treatment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43975] - right border of cell spanning multiple columns is not rendered

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Border-before/after half in margin in collapsing model for tables?

Hi, I’m planning to send a bunch of clarification requests to xsl-editors@ in the next days. While I’m at it we may also ask for clarification on this topic, unless there is something I missed (I must admit that for one time every XSL-FO implementation I’ve tried does the same). Jeremias alrea

RE: svn commit: r603945 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/ apache/fop: fo/ fo/flow/table/ fo/properties/ layoutmgr/table/

Vincent, Just a quick question coming from someone who has absolutely no clue about what you are really doing and just based on the commit comment. We have been 'bitten' before by moving things into the fo tree only to find out that it doesn't work when it comes to fo:markers as they inherit the

Re: Border-before/after half in margin in collapsing model for tables?

I see no reason to change anything unless the XSL WG clarifies in one direction or the other. On 13.12.2007 20:47:06 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi, > > I’m planning to send a bunch of clarification requests to xsl-editors@ > in the next days. While I’m at it we may also ask for clarification on