Jeremias Maerki wrote:
So, what about a 0.95 beta?
Like Chris, I'd prefer calling it a release candidate, but +1 to the
general idea.
I like the idea of an release candidate too.
J.Pietschmann
On Jan 12, 2008 8:42 AM, The Web Maestro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 2:28 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> > Refactoring the website? I've already been told several times that it
> > was difficult to find its way on it. Last time I mainly rephrased a few
> > sentences and removed bro
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Dear Fop Devs,
I think we are mixing two ideas here:
One idea (1) was to release 0.95rc, and then two weeks later 0.95
The other idea (2) is to release 0.95 and call it 0.95rc instead of 0.95beta.
(1) I think makes sense. It would mean after releasing the rc there
would be a short phase (2 week
