Re: Moving to Java 1.5, retroweaving for 1.4

Hi Clay, The Web Maestro wrote: > I agree about consistency w requirements... Perhaps one additional > release req 1.4, then move to 1.5 for the next release. I don't have > any real energy about whether the 1.0 should be 1.4 or 1.5, however... > I do agree that there should be a significant versi

Re: Moving to Java 1.5, retroweaving for 1.4

Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Vincent, I’d say it the other way round: I think that there is no compelling reason to switch to Java 1.6. Apart maybe from the internationalization area, the improvements made in that version are not likely to be that much of a benefit for FOP to justify the jump.

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Merge the ChangingIPDHack Branch Back to Trunk

Time for the results: 7 +1, no negative vote. The vote passes. I’ll proceed with the merge in the next days. Thanks, Vincent Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi All, > > Having had no feedback from the users list, I’m happy to announce that > the ChangingIPDHack branch is now totally bug-free :-) >

Re: Moving to Java 1.5, retroweaving for 1.4

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:11:34PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi Clay, > > The Web Maestro wrote: > > I agree about consistency w requirements... Perhaps one additional > > release req 1.4, then move to 1.5 for the next release. I don't have > > any real energy about whether the 1.0 should

Re: Moving to Java 1.5, retroweaving for 1.4

On 24.08.2009 14:04:13 Laurent Caillette wrote: > Hi all, > > A few thoughts about Java 1.5 support and FOP version numbers. > > I suggest to keep the emblematic "1.0" for the full support of the > XSLT-1.0 spec. I don't see any problem with FOP version hitting 0.99 or > even 0.123 one day. I do

Re: Moving to Java 1.5, retroweaving for 1.4

On 25.08.2009 20:38:19 Simon Pepping wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:11:34PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > Hi Clay, > > > > The Web Maestro wrote: > > > I agree about consistency w requirements... Perhaps one additional > > > release req 1.4, then move to 1.5 for the next release. I don'

Fwd: "keep is not auto but context is"

Begin forwarded message: From: Andreas Delmelle On 25 Aug 2009, at 12:22, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Keeps do /not/ apply to fo:table-cell: http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#fo_table-cell So whatever that warning means, it is not related to tables. OK, so I guess it's just a coincidence that the

Fwd: Love Apache? Give Back with a "MyApache" Shoutout!

-- Forwarded message -- From: Sally Khudairi Subject: Love Apache? Give Back with a "MyApache" Shoutout! The Apache Software Foundation has become a worldwide force in the software industry because of the diverse programs, applications,and tools built on its projects such as the H