DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49849] New: PDF links do only support ISO encoding

2010-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849 Summary: PDF links do only support ISO encoding Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Comp

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49849] PDF links do only support ISO encoding

2010-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849 --- Comment #1 from maximilian.as...@boc-eu.com 2010-08-31 05:32:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=25963) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25963) test case Test case with some polish characters -- Configure bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49849] PDF links do only support ISO encoding

2010-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849 --- Comment #2 from maximilian.as...@boc-eu.com 2010-08-31 05:33:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=25964) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25964) patch to utf-8 Changes the encoding to UTF-8 -- Configure bugma

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49849] PDF links do only support ISO encoding

2010-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849 maximilian.as...@boc-eu.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Reso

Re: svn commit: r990144 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline/ layoutmgr/table/ pdf/ render/ render/afp/ render/intermediate/ render/java2d/ render/pcl/ rend

2010-08-31 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Simon Pepping wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:23:12PM -, vhenneb...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: vhennebert >> Date: Fri Aug 27 13:23:11 2010 >> New Revision: 990144 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=990144&view=rev >> Log: >> Fixed indentation > In the output or in the source fil

Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-08-31 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi, I just thought I would homogenize our usage of todo tags and match what seems to be the de facto standard (“TODO”) among current committers. Most @todo indeed come from very old commits. I didn’t realise that javadoc could do something with them, which is why that looked to me like a minor cha

Re: TODO tag [was: Re: svn commit: r990148 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop: area/ fo/ fo/flow/ fo/flow/table/ fo/pagination/ fo/properties/ hyphenation/ layoutmgr/ layoutmgr/inline

2010-08-31 Thread Glenn Adams
I don't have a strong opinion on whether to keep the @asf.todo or TODO. My main interest was removing the javadocs warnings produced (under jdk1.6 doclet) through the former use of @todo. My point in bringing it up was to request that we discuss beforehand prospective changes that back-out or reve

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49849] PDF links do only support ISO encoding

2010-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849 Vincent Hennebert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FI

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49849] [PATCH] PDF links do only support ISO encoding

2010-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849 Vincent Hennebert changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|PDF links do only support |[PATCH] PDF links do only

Re: upcoming change to IFPainter.drawText()

2010-08-31 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Glenn, A dedicated class with meaningful fields (e.g., xPlacement, xAdvance) would probably be preferable to an array of 4 int. This would be safer and easier to understand and use. For the rest, that sounds good. Vincent Glenn Adams wrote: > Folks, > > I'd like to mention a change I will

Re: upcoming change to IFPainter.drawText()

2010-08-31 Thread Glenn Adams
Thanks, that's a good suggestion. I've been contemplating that for a while now. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi Glenn, > > A dedicated class with meaningful fields (e.g., xPlacement, xAdvance) > would probably be preferable to an array of 4 int. This would be safer

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49855] New: Non ASCII characters are not rended in PDF

2010-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49855 Summary: Non ASCII characters are not rended in PDF Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49855] Non ASCII characters are not rended in PDF

2010-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49855 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|