Hi Glenn,
On 05/03/12 23:29, gadams wrote:
> Author: gadams
> Date: Mon Mar 5 23:29:29 2012
> New Revision: 1297284
> Modified:
> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/complexscripts/bidi/BidiConstants.java
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45809
--- Comment #15 from Luis Bernardo 2012-03-06 09:43:46
UTC ---
The dull colors are visible in Adobe Reader but not in Evince! Could the issue
be with the viewer?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=
I agree. That is the way it is done in the Apache (httpd) and OpenSSL
souce code, where it is common to see the original authors. But then,
there is no Javadoc there...
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> + *
>> + * This work was originally authored by Glenn Adams
>> (gad
I fat-fingered the reply button instead of reply-to-all... *face-palm*
-- Forwarded message --
From: mehdi houshmand
Date: 6 March 2012 09:33
Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code
To: Craig Ringer
On 6 March 2012 00:16, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 03/05/2012 09:35 PM, mehdi houshma
-- Forwarded message --
From: mehdi houshmand
Date: 6 March 2012 10:12
Subject: Fwd: Google Summer of Code
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
I fat-fingered the reply button instead of reply-to-all... *face-palm*
-- Forwarded message --
From: mehdi houshmand
Da
On 06/03/2012 10:12, mehdi houshmand wrote:
I fat-fingered the reply button instead of reply-to-all... *face-palm*
Mehdi, Craig,
- Anything in the proposed XSL-FO 2.0 feature list (though most of it won't
be realistic for GSoC projects);
- Merge fop-pdf-image and implement smart merging of
Seems I didn't forward this one to fop-dev either... My apologies.
-- Forwarded message --
From: mehdi houshmand
Date: 29 February 2012 09:41
Subject: Re: fop-pdf-image and fonts; as requested
To: Craig Ringer
Hi Craig,
We had this exact same problem the last time you brought
Font de-duping is intrinsically a post-process action, you need the
full document, with all fonts, before you can do any font de-duping.
PostScript does this very thing (to a much lesser extent) with the
tag, as a post-process action.
Also, the requirements aren't clear here, what is it we want h
On 06/03/2012 11:08, mehdi houshmand wrote:
Hi Mehdi,
Font de-duping is intrinsically a post-process action, you need the
full document, with all fonts, before you can do any font de-duping.
PostScript does this very thing (to a much lesser extent) with the
tag, as a post-process action.
At l
My reply is interleaved below, but there's something important to cover
before reading on.
There's clearly a difference in what I mean by de-duplication vs what
you're thinking I mean by de-duplication. As far as I can tell you're
looking at font substitution and un/re-embedding, where (eg) He
On 03/06/2012 07:29 PM, Chris Bowditch wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:08, mehdi houshmand wrote:
Hi Mehdi,
Font de-duping is intrinsically a post-process action, you need the
full document, with all fonts, before you can do any font de-duping.
PostScript does this very thing (to a much lesser extent)
The ASF board policy [1] which I cited in the update conventions page (that
doesn't seem to have been rsynced yet) does not call out javadoc, but
merely indicates that attribution of original file author, if present,
should follow the copyright and license comments.
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache
fyi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tony Graham
Date: Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:25 AM
Subject: Proposed W3C "Print & Page Layout Community Group"
To: www-xsl...@w3.org
See http://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/#ppl
As the proposal text (below) states, the recent XSL-FO meetup sh
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> The ASF board policy [1] which I cited in the update conventions page
> (that doesn't seem to have been rsynced yet) does not call out javadoc
i just svn updated /www/xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop on people.apache.org, so
it should be rsynced s
On 06/03/12 18:49, mehdi houshmand wrote:
> We had this exact same problem the last time you brought this issue to
> light and our approach was slightly different. Let me first ask you
> the question, are you 100% that fonts are the issue here?
I'm never 100% certain of anything. I suspect fonts a
15 matches
Mail list logo
