[Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2012-04-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #8 from Glenn Ada

[Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2012-04-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 --- Comment #7 from Glenn Adams --- batch transition resolved+wontfix to closed+wontfix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2012-04-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2012-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- Configure bugmail: https://is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2012-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 --- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-07 01:42:09 UTC --- resetting P2 open bugs to P3 pending further review -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2011-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 --- Comment #4 from Craig Ringer 2011-12-15 07:26:33 UTC --- Please flag as importance: enhancement -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2011-12-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 --- Comment #3 from Craig Ringer 2011-12-15 07:25:17 UTC --- This looks like it might be partly by design. It seems fop registers a font more than once. It'll register the "most preferred" face for a family under the general family name,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2011-12-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 --- Comment #2 from Craig Ringer 2011-12-06 07:30:39 UTC --- It looks like the DejaVu fonts work better, but still not quite right: 15:09:30,926 FINE [org.apache.fop.fonts.FontInfo] (pool-8-thread-1) DejaVu Sans,italic,700: Replacing Dej

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2011-12-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 --- Comment #1 from Craig Ringer 2011-12-06 03:44:28 UTC --- See also https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52290, which relates to misclassification of some condensed faces. Since fop seems to be having trouble detecting the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52289] Fop misclassifies condensed fonts as regular

2011-12-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52289 Craig Ringer changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Condensed font selection|Fop misclassifies condensed