https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
Vincent Hennebert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #7 from Pascal Sancho ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I was able to implement the modified design within the allocated time frame:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1390412&view=rev
>
> Thanks for your excellent suggestion!
>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #6 from Vincent Hennebert ---
I was able to implement the modified design within the allocated time frame:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1390412&view=rev
Thanks for your excellent suggestion!
Will close the bug once I've up
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #5 from Pascal Sancho ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> I like this idea a lot, however the time I have allocated on this is running
> low. I'll see if I can modify my current implementation to do this.
>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Hennebert ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hmm,
> In PDF 1.5 spec, TH seems exist as a workaround to the limitation of the
> html table model, from witch the tagged PDF table-model seems to be inspired.
> As I said
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #3 from Pascal Sancho ---
Hmm,
In PDF 1.5 spec, TH seems exist as a workaround to the limitation of the html
table model, from witch the tagged PDF table-model seems to be inspired.
As I said, such table model describe a stacked
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Hennebert ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> IIUC, that feature aims to have a pseudo-table-header laterally rather than
> above/below.
> If this is the case, so IMHO a such extension should apply on column (or
> bet
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53902
--- Comment #1 from Pascal Sancho ---
IIUC, that feature aims to have a pseudo-table-header laterally rather than
above/below.
If this is the case, so IMHO a such extension should apply on column (or
better, on column-group).
For that, I ca
