On 13.02.2007 21:52:01 Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 08:04:00PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> > Many thanks Andreas, that was enough to get me started!
> > I've just committed a first test case for tables. This is still very
> > rough, there's no testsuite, that won't be calle
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 08:04:00PM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Many thanks Andreas, that was enough to get me started!
> I've just committed a first test case for tables. This is still very
> rough, there's no testsuite, that won't be called by ant, but as long as
> I can run the tests from E
Andreas L Delmelle a écrit :
> On Feb 12, 2007, at 20:02, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
>
>> On Feb 12, 2007, at 18:00, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>>> So my question is: is there a possibility of creating a tree of FObj
>>> instances from a corresponding FO fragment, and use it to feed objects
>>> from
On Feb 12, 2007, at 20:02, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Feb 12, 2007, at 18:00, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
So my question is: is there a possibility of creating a tree of FObj
instances from a corresponding FO fragment, and use it to feed
objects
from the layout engine in order to unit test the
On Feb 12, 2007, at 18:00, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I think the codebase is seriously lacking of unit tests, which makes
refactoring a bit hazardous. Of course there is the wonderful
layoutengine testsuite that allows to check if a XSL-FO file is
rendered
as expected (BTW, I don'
Hi All,
I think the codebase is seriously lacking of unit tests, which makes
refactoring a bit hazardous. Of course there is the wonderful
layoutengine testsuite that allows to check if a XSL-FO file is rendered
as expected (BTW, I don't remember who introduced this feature, but a
huge thanks to t
