Re: FOTree Table FOs -- definitely non-urgent, just probing...
As all of the table FOs are direct descendants of FObj this is a reasonable thought. Might really be worthwhile. On 25.08.2005 21:45:16 Andreas L Delmelle wrote: Hi all, Has anyone ever thought about introducing an abstract class for table-related FOs, say TableFObj, that would be extended by all those FOs? It just occurred to me that there are: a) the border-precedences that are applicable only to those types of FO (=all of them) b) the borders themselves that behave differently when specified on table-FOs in case of collapse(-with-precedence) I just got to thinking that an abstract superclass could be used to bundle some of that functionality. (For example: binding the border-*-precedence properties. Right now, the related code has to be repeated in at least five classes...) Although currently I don't see a compelling reason to do so, it might be an idea that's worth revisiting later on... I'll keep it on my personal list of ideas to consider, unless anyone has strong objections against such a move. WDYT? Jeremias Maerki
FOTree Table FOs -- definitely non-urgent, just probing...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Has anyone ever thought about introducing an abstract class for table-related FOs, say TableFObj, that would be extended by all those FOs? It just occurred to me that there are: a) the border-precedences that are applicable only to those types of FO (=all of them) b) the borders themselves that behave differently when specified on table-FOs in case of collapse(-with-precedence) I just got to thinking that an abstract superclass could be used to bundle some of that functionality. (For example: binding the border-*-precedence properties. Right now, the related code has to be repeated in at least five classes...) Although currently I don't see a compelling reason to do so, it might be an idea that's worth revisiting later on... I'll keep it on my personal list of ideas to consider, unless anyone has strong objections against such a move. WDYT? Cheers, Andreas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDDh/YyHTbFO9b8aARAjZOAKCmnhiY8hMUg0QZcfyGgxCeK7xD4QCgv9gZ Xh69Hymwn8k3T1P4RPgD/5Y= =cI/s -END PGP SIGNATURE-
