Re: Jimi dependency in FOP 0.95

2008-03-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Sorry. I should have removed all JARs in my optional-lib for testing. Fixed now. JAI is required for distribution builds. On 17.03.2008 12:53:00 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi, > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > On 14.03.2008 12:55:06 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > >> Jeremias Maerki wrote: > >>> On 14.03

Re: Jimi dependency in FOP 0.95

2008-03-17 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 14.03.2008 12:55:06 Vincent Hennebert wrote: >> Jeremias Maerki wrote: >>> On 14.03.2008 12:20:27 Vincent Hennebert wrote: >>> I'll remove it, sure. Do you want me to do it in the release branch or >>> in trunk? >> Please do it in the branch. Otherwise people who w

Re: Jimi dependency in FOP 0.95

2008-03-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 14.03.2008 12:55:06 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi Jeremias, > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > On 14.03.2008 12:20:27 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > >> Jeremias Maerki wrote: > >>> The new image loader framework doesn't use Jimi at all anymore. In > >>> theory, the whole old image handling classes can

Re: Jimi dependency in FOP 0.95

2008-03-14 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Jeremias, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 14.03.2008 12:20:27 Vincent Hennebert wrote: >> Jeremias Maerki wrote: >>> The new image loader framework doesn't use Jimi at all anymore. In >>> theory, the whole old image handling classes can now be removed. It >>> simply hasn't been done, yet. Deprecati

Re: Jimi dependency in FOP 0.95

2008-03-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 14.03.2008 12:20:27 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > The new image loader framework doesn't use Jimi at all anymore. In > > theory, the whole old image handling classes can now be removed. It > > simply hasn't been done, yet. Deprecation is probably not necessary in > > this

Re: Jimi dependency in FOP 0.95

2008-03-14 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Jeremias Maerki wrote: > The new image loader framework doesn't use Jimi at all anymore. In > theory, the whole old image handling classes can now be removed. It > simply hasn't been done, yet. Deprecation is probably not necessary in > this case as it is not recommended to use the old image stuff

Re: Jimi dependency in FOP 0.95

2008-03-14 Thread Jeremias Maerki
The new image loader framework doesn't use Jimi at all anymore. In theory, the whole old image handling classes can now be removed. It simply hasn't been done, yet. Deprecation is probably not necessary in this case as it is not recommended to use the old image stuff separately. I wanted to keep th

Re: Jimi dependency in FOP 0.95

2008-03-12 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Likewise there is still a src/java-1.3 directory with image-related stuff. Can it be removed now (as well as any 1.3 specific stuff)? Vincent Hennebert wrote: > I have the following error message when trying to build the artifacts: > BUILD FAILED > /local/home/vhennebert/Fop/Release/Fop-0.95/0.95

Jimi dependency in FOP 0.95

2008-03-12 Thread Vincent Hennebert
I have the following error message when trying to build the artifacts: BUILD FAILED /local/home/vhennebert/Fop/Release/Fop-0.95/0.95beta/build.xml:1237: A complete binary build requires Jimi The release notes say that Jimi and JAI are no longer needed. So what’s the real status? Thanks, Vincent