Hi Manuel,
> unfortunately for the purpose of understanding the area tree, the
> terminology, and the geometry the XSL-FO specification is your best
> friend
Yes, I've heard that before. Hope that support/extensive documentation will
grow up later. It's usually the case with dynamically progressi
On Monday 02 October 2006 17:12, Andrejus Chaliapinas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While some of you already told me that I should look through XSL-FO
> for those calculations (Jeremias mentioned how I would get value of
> 14400) - I still would like to ask you if you could point me to any
> document (proba