icated this would be so know I do and realise
> the docs are very important to me right now.
>
> Thanks for the encouragement.
>
> Barry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:d...@jeremias-maerki.ch]
> Sent: 16 February 2009 22:42
> To: fop-d
erki [mailto:d...@jeremias-maerki.ch]
Sent: 16 February 2009 22:42
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flow-Map
Hi Barry,
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "adding the xml to the tree".
Does that mean you managed to get the FO tree objects built from th
Hi Barry,
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "adding the xml to the tree".
Does that mean you managed to get the FO tree objects built from the
corresponding FO elements? The stuff in ElementMapping, the necessary FO
tree classes, the makers? How far did you really get?
Anyway, I remember
Bedin, Guilherme (R&D Brazil) wrote:
Hi,
I have been developing modifications on fop-0.25 to suite our need
for a couple of years. And now we are trying to move on and start to use
fop-0.92.
To start, I am trying to implement fo:flow-map support on the 0.92 code
(I am using the code from 11/2
