Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Yeah, and taking into account that quite a lot of people forget to
remove the indent attribute from xsl:output once they know the FO to be
generated correctly...
I don't think it's all that bad. The indent attribute has no effect
unless the output of the XSLT is seria
On Aug 8, 2006, at 11:10, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I agree with the interpretation. I just wonder whether a normal
user will
get it. Hmm.
Yeah, and taking into account that quite a lot of people forget to
remove the indent attribute from xsl:output once they know the FO to
be generated cor
I agree with the interpretation. I just wonder whether a normal user will
get it. Hmm.
On 07.08.2006 18:21:24 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 13:23, Manuel Mall wrote:
>
> > On Monday 07 August 2006 18:33, Chris Bowditch wrote:
> >>
> >> Surely this rule in the spec means first no
On Aug 7, 2006, at 13:23, Manuel Mall wrote:
On Monday 07 August 2006 18:33, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Surely this rule in the spec means first non-whitespace only node???
In any case, this is how FOP should behave IMO.
I am not so sure here. If this is illegal:
Some text before the marker
On Monday 07 August 2006 18:33, Chris Bowditch wrote:
> Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> > I discovered the following in our testcase 'marker_font-size.xml'
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > First marker with small font
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > According to the Rec, a marker must be an initial chil
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
I discovered the following in our testcase 'marker_font-size.xml'
First marker with small font
According to the Rec, a marker must be an initial child of its parent,
but the above generates a FOText child node for which willCreateArea()
re
