On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:28 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Mostly a compliance issue. If you look at it from the XSL-1.1 POV,
> it's probably a bug, too. ATM, I'm unsure what to do. We probably
> need to verify that we understand the spec concerning the top/left
> properties on absolutely positioned bl
Mostly a compliance issue. If you look at it from the XSL-1.1 POV, it's
probably a bug, too. ATM, I'm unsure what to do. We probably need to
verify that we understand the spec concerning the top/left properties on
absolutely positioned block-containers correctly. I'm tempted to leave
everything lik
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:40 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Probably the "partial" indicator. Please review the following thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/Preparing-for-the-first-release---Examples-t542
>439.html#a1461388
>
> (especially the part where we realized that the spec changed in a
> backwards-i
Probably the "partial" indicator. Please review the following thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Preparing-for-the-first-release---Examples-t542439.html#a1461388
(especially the part where we realized that the spec changed in a
backwards-incompatible way). At some point this will have to be looked
at a
