I know it's not strictly necessary. It's just there for regression
testing purposes and as a demonstration that you don't have to use the
fo: prefix. It doesn't hurt, does it?
On 09.11.2005 21:38:32 Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:58:24AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: jeremias
> > Date: Wed Nov 9 00:58:20 2005
> > New Revision: 332007
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332007&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Test to check FO tree building when no namespace prefix is used.
>
> Why is this necessary? Doesn't the parser resolve the prefix and then
> hide it from FOP?
Jeremias Maerki