Further on this topic -
It appears that the 1.0 spec has some deficiencies in the area of
whitespace treatment. This has been recognized by the WG as summarized
in this post to xsl-editors:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2003JulSep/0012.
Again it was Karen who initiated the disc
Manuel Mall wrote:
Not sure if this is another of those areas in the spec which is cause
for much confusion but I noticed that FOP trunk collapses white space
across fo:inlines.
This isn't the correct behavior, as well as collapsing across
a changed text decoration. Unfortunately, this isn't e
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 05:14 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> That helps a lot. Thanks for looking it up! Yes, Karen was a
> "Fopper", and a good one. Now, the only thing left is to fix the bug.
> :-)
>
Its a bug in the "inline" part of FOP so its probably me or Luca in the
moment.
> Jeremias Maerki
Ma
That helps a lot. Thanks for looking it up! Yes, Karen was a "Fopper",
and a good one. Now, the only thing left is to fix the bug. :-)
On 06.10.2005 10:23:49 Manuel Mall wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 03:44 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > What I write next should be consumed with caution and the fact
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 03:44 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> What I write next should be consumed with caution and the fact in
> mind that English is a foreign language to me, because I have big
> trouble translating 4.2.4. 4.2.4 defines "preceding" WRT to the area
> tree, but I really can't parse that se
What I write next should be consumed with caution and the fact in mind
that English is a foreign language to me, because I have big trouble
translating 4.2.4. 4.2.4 defines "preceding" WRT to the area tree, but I
really can't parse that section. OTOH, 7.15.12 talks about flow objects,
not areas, ev
