Hi,
Thomas Dörr thomas.doerr at haufe-lexware.net writes:
But I'd prefer continuing to
use FOP.
Same here, FOP served us very well in the past and there is no reason to switch…
We'd need it in a short time, let's say in the next two weeks and of
course we'd pay for that implementation.
Let
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your interest in FOP. Support for fo:retrieve-table-marker is
something that I also need, unfortunately I personally am too busy ATM
to work on an implementation. If nobody else beats me to it, I might
have a chance to work on it later in the year, although nothing
for your answer.
Best Regards,
Thomas
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your interest in FOP. Support for fo:retrieve-table-marker is
something that I also need, unfortunately I personally am too busy ATM
to work
Hi all,
I'm using FOP for a project and I need to implement subtotals and
carryovers for estimates and invoices. I tried to use
fo:retrieve-table-marker, but as far as I understand, they are not
fully implemented. A workaround with fo:retrieve.marker has a lot of
disadvantages and is not
