Re: Support for fo:retrieve-table-marker
Hi, Thomas Dörr haufe-lexware.net> writes: > But I'd prefer continuing to > use FOP. Same here, FOP served us very well in the past and there is no reason to switch… > We'd need it in a short time, let's say in the next two weeks and of > course we'd pay for that implementation. Let me second that, if someone steps up to implement that I am sure we can throw money into the bowl too. Regards, Florian
Re: Support for fo:retrieve-table-marker
Hi Vincent, thank you for your answer. I think it might be good for FOP to support this feature, even if it is later in this year. If you want to implement some business documents, table-markers are really necessary. I contacted Andreas Delmelle before and he told me that he could help out with some design ideas, but he is also not available to implement this feature. We probably need this feature in the next weeks, since we will go live and as far as I see, our invoices need the feature. But anyway, I have to discuss that with my colleagues. I'll keep you posted. Again, thanks again for your answer. Best Regards, Thomas On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for your interest in FOP. Support for fo:retrieve-table-marker is > something that I also need, unfortunately I personally am too busy ATM > to work on an implementation. If nobody else beats me to it, I might > have a chance to work on it later in the year, although nothing is > guaranteed. > > At any rate, I don’t think the work is doable in two weeks. Like > everything that touches the layout engine this is quite tricky. Also, > I studied the topic some time ago and found that the layout engine has > design issues that would greatly constrain what you can do with table > markers. Basically that would work only if the presence of the retrieved > content dos not affect the height of the table-header/footer. > Fortunately your use case would fall within that limit, IIC. > > Vincent > > > On 06/02/12 09:26, Thomas Dörr wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm using FOP for a project and I need to implement subtotals and > > carryovers for estimates and invoices. I tried to use > > fo:retrieve-table-marker, but as far as I understand, they are not > > fully implemented. A workaround with fo:retrieve.marker has a lot of > > disadvantages and is not sufficient. > > > > One solution would be to buy a commercial product like www.xmlpdf.com, > > which supports fo:retrieve-table-marker. But I'd prefer continuing to > > use FOP. > > > > Is there anyone, who has the knowledge to implement the > > fo:retrieve-table-marker feature? > > > > We'd need it in a short time, let's say in the next two weeks and of > > course we'd pay for that implementation. > > > > Hoping to get an answer from you guys! > > > > Best Regards, > > Thomas >
Re: Support for fo:retrieve-table-marker
Hi Thomas, Thanks for your interest in FOP. Support for fo:retrieve-table-marker is something that I also need, unfortunately I personally am too busy ATM to work on an implementation. If nobody else beats me to it, I might have a chance to work on it later in the year, although nothing is guaranteed. At any rate, I don’t think the work is doable in two weeks. Like everything that touches the layout engine this is quite tricky. Also, I studied the topic some time ago and found that the layout engine has design issues that would greatly constrain what you can do with table markers. Basically that would work only if the presence of the retrieved content dos not affect the height of the table-header/footer. Fortunately your use case would fall within that limit, IIC. Vincent On 06/02/12 09:26, Thomas Dörr wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using FOP for a project and I need to implement subtotals and > carryovers for estimates and invoices. I tried to use > fo:retrieve-table-marker, but as far as I understand, they are not > fully implemented. A workaround with fo:retrieve.marker has a lot of > disadvantages and is not sufficient. > > One solution would be to buy a commercial product like www.xmlpdf.com, > which supports fo:retrieve-table-marker. But I'd prefer continuing to > use FOP. > > Is there anyone, who has the knowledge to implement the > fo:retrieve-table-marker feature? > > We'd need it in a short time, let's say in the next two weeks and of > course we'd pay for that implementation. > > Hoping to get an answer from you guys! > > Best Regards, > Thomas
Support for fo:retrieve-table-marker
Hi all, I'm using FOP for a project and I need to implement subtotals and carryovers for estimates and invoices. I tried to use fo:retrieve-table-marker, but as far as I understand, they are not fully implemented. A workaround with fo:retrieve.marker has a lot of disadvantages and is not sufficient. One solution would be to buy a commercial product like www.xmlpdf.com, which supports fo:retrieve-table-marker. But I'd prefer continuing to use FOP. Is there anyone, who has the knowledge to implement the fo:retrieve-table-marker feature? We'd need it in a short time, let's say in the next two weeks and of course we'd pay for that implementation. Hoping to get an answer from you guys! Best Regards, Thomas
