Re: URIs: scheme vs. schema

2012-07-26 Thread mehdi houshmand
Hi Jeremias,

You are correct, I'll fix this as soon as it's convenient.

Mehdi

On 26 July 2012 17:36, Jeremias Maerki  wrote:

> When I've looked through the changes made to FOP's public API, I was
> wondering what a SchemaAwareResourceResolver was. First thought was:
> what does that have to do with XML Schema? With the recent thread on
> fop-users I realized that this should really be "SchemeAware".
> Please check the naming in java.net.URI.
>
> BTW, can I hope for a convenience adapter for the URIResolver interface
> at some point, or do I have to write that myself eventually?
>
> I'm dreading the day where I have to adjust all my applications to the
> API changes. From what I've seen so far, I can't count a single
> change that I'd consider to be an improvement, only steps backwards,
> compared to before the changes. I'm only seeing lots of work adjusting
> to the changes.
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>


URIs: scheme vs. schema

2012-07-26 Thread Jeremias Maerki
When I've looked through the changes made to FOP's public API, I was
wondering what a SchemaAwareResourceResolver was. First thought was:
what does that have to do with XML Schema? With the recent thread on
fop-users I realized that this should really be "SchemeAware".
Please check the naming in java.net.URI.

BTW, can I hope for a convenience adapter for the URIResolver interface
at some point, or do I have to write that myself eventually?

I'm dreading the day where I have to adjust all my applications to the
API changes. From what I've seen so far, I can't count a single
change that I'd consider to be an improvement, only steps backwards,
compared to before the changes. I'm only seeing lots of work adjusting
to the changes.

Jeremias Maerki