Re: Unable to get wingdings glyph in 1.1rc1

[Håkon Clausen]

I see, but it seems that I still do not understand this.

If I e.g. try this to get the "X IN A RECTANGLE BOX" glyph:
x
⌧
ग

I still get:
Glyph "x" (0x78, x) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "⌧" (0x2327, clear) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "ग" (0x917, gadeva) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".

The font is added with the auto-detect feature. Do I need to take some  
additional steps to get this to work?



På Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:00:58 +0200, skrev Glenn Adams :


1.0 was broken in the sense that it mis-interpreted character codes
according to the native font encoding, while 1.1 correctly interprets as
Unicode only; in other words, 1.1 conforms to XSL-FO with respect to the
interpretation of character codes, while 1.0 did not always do so; your
test file depends (wrongly) on this broken 1.0 behavior;

as I have said previously, you need to use Unicode encodings; see the
following page for some information on a possible Unicode mapping for
Wingding

http://www.csn.ul.ie/~caolan/wingdings/proposal/


On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Håkon Clausen  wrote:


Thanks,

I have attached the PDF output, which is a-z and A-Z. In 1.1 you get no
correct output, not for i-z either.
Why is this working in 1.0 when the glyphs does not exists and why is  
not

1.1 working for the other glyphs?

Håkon

På Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:56:03 +0200, skrev Glenn Adams  
:


 Wingdings does not contain 'a' through 'h'. You need to use the proper

Unicode character codes as supported by Wingdings.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Håkon Clausen  wrote:

 Hi,

I have wingdings font installed on my system (
http://webfonts.googlecode.*
*com/files/wingding.ttffiles/wingding.ttf  
>)


and using attached fo file. Under FOP 1.0 everything works as expected
but
in 1.1RC1 it failes with:

Glyph "a" (0x61, a) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "b" (0x62, b) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "c" (0x63, c) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "d" (0x64, d) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "e" (0x65, e) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "f" (0x66, f) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "g" (0x67, g) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "h" (0x68, h) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".


Any advice or is this a bug?

--
Håkon Clausen
dRofus AS





--
Håkon Clausen
dRofus AS
+47 22 33 15 70 / skype: hakonhc



--
Håkon Clausen
dRofus AS
+47 22 33 15 70 / skype: hakonhc

Re: Unable to get wingdings glyph in 1.1rc1

[Håkon Clausen]

Thanks,

I have attached the PDF output, which is a-z and A-Z. In 1.1 you get no  
correct output, not for i-z either.
Why is this working in 1.0 when the glyphs does not exists and why is not  
1.1 working for the other glyphs?


Håkon

På Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:56:03 +0200, skrev Glenn Adams :


Wingdings does not contain 'a' through 'h'. You need to use the proper
Unicode character codes as supported by Wingdings.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Håkon Clausen  wrote:


Hi,
I have wingdings font installed on my system  
(http://webfonts.googlecode.*

*com/files/wingding.ttf)
and using attached fo file. Under FOP 1.0 everything works as expected  
but

in 1.1RC1 it failes with:

Glyph "a" (0x61, a) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "b" (0x62, b) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "c" (0x63, c) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "d" (0x64, d) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "e" (0x65, e) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "f" (0x66, f) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "g" (0x67, g) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "h" (0x68, h) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".


Any advice or is this a bug?

--
Håkon Clausen
dRofus AS



--
Håkon Clausen
dRofus AS
+47 22 33 15 70 / skype: hakonhc

wingdings1.1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


wingdings1.0.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Re: Unable to get wingdings glyph in 1.1rc1

[Glenn Adams]

1.0 was broken in the sense that it mis-interpreted character codes
according to the native font encoding, while 1.1 correctly interprets as
Unicode only; in other words, 1.1 conforms to XSL-FO with respect to the
interpretation of character codes, while 1.0 did not always do so; your
test file depends (wrongly) on this broken 1.0 behavior;

as I have said previously, you need to use Unicode encodings; see the
following page for some information on a possible Unicode mapping for
Wingding

http://www.csn.ul.ie/~caolan/wingdings/proposal/


On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Håkon Clausen  wrote:

> Thanks,
>
> I have attached the PDF output, which is a-z and A-Z. In 1.1 you get no
> correct output, not for i-z either.
> Why is this working in 1.0 when the glyphs does not exists and why is not
> 1.1 working for the other glyphs?
>
> Håkon
>
> På Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:56:03 +0200, skrev Glenn Adams :
>
>  Wingdings does not contain 'a' through 'h'. You need to use the proper
>> Unicode character codes as supported by Wingdings.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Håkon Clausen  wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>> I have wingdings font installed on my system (
>>> http://webfonts.googlecode.*
>>> *com/files/wingding.ttf>> files/wingding.ttf >)
>>>
>>> and using attached fo file. Under FOP 1.0 everything works as expected
>>> but
>>> in 1.1RC1 it failes with:
>>>
>>> Glyph "a" (0x61, a) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
>>> Glyph "b" (0x62, b) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
>>> Glyph "c" (0x63, c) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
>>> Glyph "d" (0x64, d) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
>>> Glyph "e" (0x65, e) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
>>> Glyph "f" (0x66, f) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
>>> Glyph "g" (0x67, g) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
>>> Glyph "h" (0x68, h) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
>>>
>>>
>>> Any advice or is this a bug?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Håkon Clausen
>>> dRofus AS
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Håkon Clausen
> dRofus AS
> +47 22 33 15 70 / skype: hakonhc

Re: Unable to get wingdings glyph in 1.1rc1

[Glenn Adams]

Wingdings does not contain 'a' through 'h'. You need to use the proper
Unicode character codes as supported by Wingdings.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Håkon Clausen  wrote:

> Hi,
> I have wingdings font installed on my system (http://webfonts.googlecode.*
> *com/files/wingding.ttf)
> and using attached fo file. Under FOP 1.0 everything works as expected but
> in 1.1RC1 it failes with:
>
> Glyph "a" (0x61, a) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
> Glyph "b" (0x62, b) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
> Glyph "c" (0x63, c) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
> Glyph "d" (0x64, d) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
> Glyph "e" (0x65, e) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
> Glyph "f" (0x66, f) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
> Glyph "g" (0x67, g) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
> Glyph "h" (0x68, h) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
>
>
> Any advice or is this a bug?
>
> --
> Håkon Clausen
> dRofus AS

Unable to get wingdings glyph in 1.1rc1

[Håkon Clausen]

Hi,
I have wingdings font installed on my system  
(http://webfonts.googlecode.com/files/wingding.ttf) and using attached fo  
file. Under FOP 1.0 everything works as expected but in 1.1RC1 it failes  
with:


Glyph "a" (0x61, a) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "b" (0x62, b) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "c" (0x63, c) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "d" (0x64, d) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "e" (0x65, e) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "f" (0x66, f) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "g" (0x67, g) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".
Glyph "h" (0x68, h) not available in font "Wingdings-Regular".


Any advice or is this a bug?

--
Håkon Clausen
dRofus AS

wingdings.fo
Description: Binary data