Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'd like to add that tabs are considered whitespace in XML. Tabs as in
Word can't be used in XSL-FO.
Well, the fact that tabs are white-space is only relevant for
validation. Tabs are passed through to the application unchanged.
It's the XSLFO spec which guides how tabs
On 13.04.2003 00:15:19 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
starting with red hat's xmlto utility and the most recent
docbook stylesheets, i hacked the xmlto utility to accept a
request to use FOP (rather than passivetex) to do the FO - PDF
step, and it's not only *way* faster than passivetex, the
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 13.04.2003 00:15:19 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
[ERROR] Couldn't find hyphenation pattern en
[ERROR] Error building hyphenation tree for language en
The en hyphenation pattern had to be removed because of licensing
problems. You can use en_GB
That's the language property:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice7.html#language
hyphenate enables/disables hyphenation altogether.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice7.html#hyphenate
On 13.04.2003 11:50:45 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 13.04.2003 00:15:19
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 13.04.2003 00:15:19 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
starting with red hat's xmlto utility and the most recent
docbook stylesheets, i hacked the xmlto utility to accept a
request to use FOP (rather than passivetex) to do the FO - PDF
step, and
aaargh ... one typo in that previous post:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
--
at this point, you can just run something like:
$ xmlto fopdf -v --extensions -m frag1.xsl -m frag2.xsl -o dbfile.xml
don't use the -o option there.
i figured i'd explain this once in its entirety to find
out just what part of this i'm missing.
i want to use red hat's xmlto utility and FOP to process
docbook into PDF. if you're familiar with xmlto (or even if
you're not), the basic invocation is
$ xmlto {fo,ps,dvi,...} -m frag1 -m
apparently, i spoke too soon about how easy it was to extend
red hat's xmlto utility to select FOP instead of passivetex
for the FO - PDF step. here's the problem, perhaps someone
has a suggestion.
in my original docbook file, i want to incorporate some simple
figures, admonition images,
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
ah, i hadn't noticed that, thanks. and i realize that this may be
painfully obvious, but it's important for me that invoking this
xalan.bat to generate the intermediate FO would produce exactly
the same intermediate FO that would be generated by going
directly from XML+XSL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the fo:flow text fills the whole page, I am able only to show what
is in footnote's fo:inline, but the footnote text itself is not shown at
all, not even on another page. I slightly modified example from FOP
(0.20.5), so it shows exactly that case. Is there some
10 matches
Mail list logo
