Re: Is there any alternative to the "Keep-together" property

2002-04-25 Thread Nestel, Frank ISC 6
In some cases one can work around that problem by putting your content into tables, since these attributes work for table-rows. At least some of these attributes, I think e.g. keep-with-next. But in other circumstances (i.e. certain problems with multicolumn layout) there is now workaround as far

AW: AW: Again: keep-together

2002-04-22 Thread Nestel, Frank ISC 6
ments, that looks like the only way to go for now unless someone else can chime in with a solution I haven't seen yet. Chuck Nestel, Frank ISC 6 wrote: >Hello Chuck, > >thank you for replying. Unfortunately I failed to express myself clearly. >Maybe since there are different pr

vertical-align, was: footnote design

2002-04-19 Thread Nestel, Frank ISC 6
BTW when will vertical-align="sub" be fixed? Currently it formats text slightly low. It does not know about moving the subscript close to the corresponding Text and the subscripts collide with the next line in running text? Frank Nestel -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ingo Bruell [mailto

AW: Again: keep-together

2002-04-19 Thread Nestel, Frank ISC 6
ables with the one column header on the area (That way, if the table happens to break across a page boundary, the table header is repeated on the next page.) Chuck Paussa > Nestel, Frank ISC 6 wrote: > > I know you all work hard. But just to express priority. > We are currently s

Again: keep-together

2002-04-18 Thread Nestel, Frank ISC 6
I know you all work hard. But just to express priority. We are currently stuck with a problem we cannot see how to cope without working "keep" properties. Or can anybody give me some help on how to achive below layout with fop. 1.one-column header 2.two-column ta