Cyril Rognon schrieb:
Hi Ronald,
I think this was an error in the former FOP version. If you use unicode
values of the needed character everything works perfectly with 0.20.3RC
or 0.20.3...
Yes, just have a look at docs/examples/fo/fonts.fo
Christian
ronald heller wrote:
fo:block space-after=0pt
fo:inline text-decoration=none font-family=Times
RomanM/fo:inline
fo:inline text-decoration=none
font-family=SymbolM/fo:inline
fo:inline text-decoration=none
font-family=ZapfDingbatsM/fo:inline
/fo:block
With fop 0.20.3RC all