Glen,
Thanks, I will just have to pass another tag through & keep using -xsl then.
Regards,
Roland
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Default stylesheet
>
&g
--- Roland Neilands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [ERROR] Expected XSL-FO (root, page-sequence, etc.),
> SVG (svg, rect, etc.) or el
> ements from another supported language.
>
> I think FOP can do it, it just needs to not set the
> -xsl flag and/or this error turned into a warning:
> "[ERROR] XSL
> But if his input XML is already XSL-processable
> (perhaps indicated by the fact that only a default
> stylesheet would be needed to "transform" it), I think
> FOP can do this already. How about:
>
> fop -fo abc.xml -pdf abc.pdf
Nope.
[ERROR] Expected XSL-FO (root, page-sequence, etc.), SVG (
Oh--now I see, it means a stylesheet embedded within
the XML file.
Glen
--- Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know what a XSLT "default stylesheet" is --
> checking the XSLT Rec for "default" is not showing
> any place where this is defined. (I believe
> browsers
> have them, but
I don't know what a XSLT "default stylesheet" is --
checking the XSLT Rec for "default" is not showing
any place where this is defined. (I believe browsers
have them, but that wouldn't be applicable for our
discussion here.)
But if his input XML is already XSL-processable
(perhaps indicated by t
You're welcome to write a patch for the code in CVS HEAD so we have this
feature ready when we're ready to start releasing again. Obviously, this
isn't implemented in FOP 0.20.5.
On 03.03.2005 06:55:01 Roland Neilands wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an interesting question:
> Can FOP use the XML defa
