AW: AW: Reuse of fo-tree

2002-12-04 Thread Alexander Koppelhuber
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. Dezember 2002 22:22 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: Reuse of fo-tree Alexander Koppelhuber wrote: I don't have an answer to your question, but my observation with fop is that subsequent rendering is much faster than the first one. Even

Reuse of fo-tree

2002-12-03 Thread Henrik Olsson
Hi, are there any possibility to reuse a fo-tree in the fop and run it throw more then one renderer? For example I want a printout PCL or PostSript and then I want to store a pdf in an archive, since the document can be quite big I dont want to rebild the tree more than once. /Henrik Olsson

AW: Reuse of fo-tree

2002-12-03 Thread Alexander Koppelhuber
is done internally. -Ursprngliche Nachricht-Von: Henrik Olsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. Dezember 2002 11:36An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Reuse of fo-treeHi, are there any possibility to reuse a fo-tree in the fop and run it throw more then one renderer

Re: Reuse of fo-tree

2002-12-03 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Henrik Olsson wrote: Rewriting the Driver and the StreamRenderer with a cache will do the trick I think. Are there any things of impotance You know that I have to bother aboute? It's supposed to be addressed by redesign currently under way, but you can implement it yourself, it's open source

Re: AW: Reuse of fo-tree

2002-12-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Alexander Koppelhuber wrote: I don't have an answer to your question, but my observation with fop is that subsequent rendering is much faster than the first one. Even if you change the content (texts, images). And also if you render to AWT first, and then to pdf. So I guess that reuse of a fop