[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. Dezember 2002 22:22
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: Reuse of fo-tree
Alexander Koppelhuber wrote:
I don't have an answer to your question, but my observation with fop is
that subsequent rendering is much faster than the first one. Even
Hi, are there any possibility to reuse a fo-tree in the fop and run it throw more then one renderer?
For example I want a printout PCL or PostSript and then I want to store a pdf in an archive, since the document can be quite big I dont want to rebild the tree more than once.
/Henrik Olsson
is
done
internally.
-Ursprngliche Nachricht-Von: Henrik Olsson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. Dezember
2002 11:36An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Reuse of
fo-treeHi, are there any
possibility to reuse a fo-tree in the fop and run it throw more then one
renderer
Henrik Olsson wrote:
Rewriting the Driver and the StreamRenderer with a cache will do the
trick I think.
Are there any things of impotance You know that I have to bother aboute?
It's supposed to be addressed by redesign currently under way, but you can
implement it yourself, it's open source
Alexander Koppelhuber wrote:
I don't have an answer to your question, but my observation with fop is
that subsequent rendering is much faster than the first one. Even if you
change the content (texts, images). And also if you render to AWT first,
and then to pdf. So I guess that reuse of a fop