RE: Footer placement...
Thanks Chris. Will try out your suggestion and get back to the list of the outcome. Anil. -Original Message- From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 8:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Footer placement... Anil R. Pinto wrote: snip/ But with the marker approach I noticed that the footer area has to be allocated to the other pages (using the layout and region-after values applicable to the pages) irrespective. So, untimately although no footer is printed on the middle pages, the area is consumed by a blank portion and so paper will not really be saved (the main intention of this exercise :-) ) Sounds to me like you can fulfill your requirement using a footnote. A footnote only takes up space if present. So just put a footnote in your last paragraph and it should appear at the bottom of the last page. No need to define a region-after. The only problem with footnotes is that they are a bit buggy in current version of FOP. Certain scenarios may produce strange effects, e.g. if last paragraph in document happens to be at bottom of page, then there will be room for footnote. What should happen is FOP should move last paragraph to next page along with footnote, but I dont think this works. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: AW: chinese characters just working when defined in xsl-fo-page directly
I found out now, that the problem lies in the esql query, I generate an XML through xsp/esql with cocoon, if I have a look on the generated xml, I can see that the chinese glyphs are not shown as such ones, just the ones I define in the xsp page. So there must be something wrong with the querying. I use the jdbc driver from MS, and my database is MSSQL, Anyone an Idea how to get Unicode data out of the database?? christoph -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Samstag, 06. November 2004 12:21 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: chinese characters just working when defined in xsl-fo-page directly Christoph Klocker wrote: Thats what I did, when I Serialize it to XML its as it is stated here, so I got no Idea, why this doesn't work FaaLocTextCH#32173;#20063;#32013;/FaaLocTextCH I am happy for any suggestion how to solve this problem. I meant: serialize the input to the PDF serializer to XML, after the transformation. You should not get a FaaLocTextCH element in a FO document. Be sure you aren't using disable-output-escaping either. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XSL-FO Specification
Hello All, We are very interested in XSL-FO concepts. Can you please clarify the Specification version of XSL-FO as per W3C. What are the limitations in this version? When is the next version is going to be released? What are the points that will be addressed in the next version in the current limitations? It will be really helpful if you give this details. thanks and regards,bala
Re: XSL-FO Specification
Balamuraly wrote: Hello All, We are very interested in XSL-FO concepts. Can you please clarify the Specification version of XSL-FO as per W3C. What are the limitations in this version? See the compliance page for details: http://xml.apache.org/fop/compliance.html When is the next version is going to be released? Open Source Development is very different to commercial development. There are no project plans. It is likely to be a long time before the redesigned code is ready for release. What are the points that will be addressed in the next version in the current limitations? The main purpose of the redesigned code is to facilitate the implementation of keep-* properties. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XSL-FO Specification
On Nov 9, 2004, at 7:30 AM, Balamuraly wrote: Hello All, We are very interested in XSL-FO concepts. Can you please clarify the Specification version of XSL-FO as per W3C. What are the limitations in this version? These questions are answered in detail here[1]. When is the next version is going to be released? That has not yet been clearly defined, although a search of the fop-dev archives (see the FOP Mailing List page[2]) will provide more insight. What are the points that will be addressed in the next version in the current limitations? You may find information on this topic by reading the FOP Status page[3]. Also, the fop-dev archives may provide more insight here, as well. Finally the FOP Development: General Information page[4] has even more information. It will be really helpful if you give this details. thanks and regards, bala I hope this helps you find what you are looking for. We welcome contributors, so if you are interested in contributing, please let us know. On a side note, I'll probably be adding a link to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list to our FOP Resources page. I see you already have posts from some of our committers there. [1] http://xml.apache.org/fop/compliance.html [2] http://xml.apache.org/fop/maillist.html [3] http://xml.apache.org/fop/status.html [4] http://xml.apache.org/fop/dev/ Web Maestro Clay -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webmaster/Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com/ PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fo failed to process Unicode CJK in servlet
But I checked the jar file against class loader order, couldn't find any clues yet. Thank you Pietschmann for your help. Liang MA Software Analyst -- RADARSAT Mission Control Centre 6767, route de l'Aeroport Saint-Hubert, Quebec J3Y 8Y9 Canada Tel: (450) 926-5099 Fax: (450) 926-5127 --- -Original Message- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 6, 2004 6:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: fo failed to process Unicode CJK in servlet Ma, Liang wrote: Now here is another minor problem. Every time when I first run the servlet to generate a pdf file after rebooting tomcat or leaving it for a couple of days, it gives me the following exception. Then I run it again, it works fine. Looks like there is something missing to initialize fop in my servlet. root cause java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.fop.apps.Service.providers(Driver.java:597) Ah, the dreaded class loader problem. Actually, I don't understand class loading in web apps well enough to point you to a solution. You might ask this on an appropriate Tomcat list (be prepared for getting flamed for using code which is not web app ready) J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XSL-FO Specification
On Nov 9, 2004, at 8:24 AM, Clay Leeds wrote: snip On a side note, I'll probably be adding a link to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list to our FOP Resources page. I see you already have posts from some of our committers there. [1] http://xml.apache.org/fop/compliance.html [2] http://xml.apache.org/fop/maillist.html I see you're already on this page! :-) I'll be adding you (and the other Mailing Lists to the FOP Resources page. [3] http://xml.apache.org/fop/status.html [4] http://xml.apache.org/fop/dev/ Web Maestro Clay -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webmaster/Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com/ PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
