Re: How do I stop table cell wrapping?
You can do that whith the attribute "wrap-option" set to "no-wrap" like this : - Original Message - From: "John Bourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: How do I stop table cell wrapping? > > Guys is there a way to stop cells in a table wrapping the text to the next > line and simply cutting the data if it's longer than the cell width? I would > think there may be some kind of attribute to do this? > > > *** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. Any unauthorised distribution or copying is strictly > prohibited. > > Whilst Cedar Plc takes steps to prevent the transmission of > viruses via e-mail, we can not guarantee that any email or > attachment is free from computer viruses and you are strongly > advised to undertake your own anti-virus precautions. > > Cedar Plc grants no warranties regarding performance, > use or quality of any e-mail or attachment and undertakes no > liability for loss or damage, howsoever caused. >
Setting a maximum number of charcaters in a line
Hi, Is there any solution for setting a maximum number of charcaters whitin a line ? I have to built two areas with 4 lines of 80 charcaters each, in a PDF document. Thank you Stéphane
Re: Is there any alternative to the "Keep-together" property
OK, THANKS The attributes keepwith-previous & keep whith next works well in a table ! Waiting for it work within fo:block Stéphane - Original Message - From: "Nestel, Frank ISC 6" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:27 PM Subject: Re: Is there any alternative to the "Keep-together" property In some cases one can work around that problem by putting your content into tables, since these attributes work for table-rows. At least some of these attributes, I think e.g. keep-with-next. But in other circumstances (i.e. certain problems with multicolumn layout) there is now workaround as far as I know (and we've been searching desparately). We're also looking forward to see those attributes actually work on blocks. Frank -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stéphane REYNIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 25. April 2002 15:40 An: Mailing list FOP Betreff: Is there any alternative to the "Keep-together" property As we all know, the following properties still don't work with fop 0.20.3: keep-together keep-with-previous keep-with-next Is there any solution to do it another way ? Does someone know when will these functions be implemented in FOP ? Thank you Stéphane
Is there any alternative to the "Keep-together" property
As we all know, the following properties still don't work with fop 0.20.3: keep-together keep-with-previous keep-with-next Is there any solution to do it another way ? Does someone know when will these functions be implemented in FOP ? Thank you Stéphane
