Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Frédéric and Reto,
having read the 24.1.2 Programming restrictions of the EJB 2.0
specification, I'd recommend you guys don't call FOP from an EJB. The
programming restrictions forbid among other things the following:
- Reading or writing of static variables (FOP still does
On 11.02.2003 06:37:26 Peter B. West wrote:
There you go giving me heart failure again, Jeremias.
Stop it, Peter! I'm not writing a scientific paper here. I'm trying to
help. It was my attempt to convey the problems I had in the past dealing
with static constructs within EJBs. Be careful not to
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: lundi 10 février 2003 16:16
À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Fop and multithreading.
Hi Jeremias,
I do agree very much with you about the concerns on EJB usage, though
unfortunately drop the EJB
Ok, I've put together a ZIP and put it under the URL below:
http://cvs.apache.org/~jeremias/FOPMTTestbed.zip
I hope you don't mind that it's heavily relying on Avalon (especially
Fortress). I've put all the necessary JARs in the lib directory. I
didn't include fop.jar and batik.jar which you can
Jeremias,
Humble apologies. I'm worried myself about having taken the wrong
approach wrt EJBs, in this case especially regarding the threads, so my
heart was in my mouth when I first read this. Heaven help us if your
motivation is undermined.
Peter
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 11.02.2003
Salut Frederic,
I am experiencing the same kind of problem as you do. In a multithreaded
env. (multiprocessor UNIX box, executing FOP in an EJB on weblogic) I see
that font sizes in different threads are messed up. In difference to your
problem I am producing TIFF output (using AWTRenderer). I
. Maybe this will help.
Frédéric
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: lundi 10 février 2003 12:45
À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: Antwort: Fop and multithreading.
Salut Frederic,
I am experiencing the same kind of problem as you do. In a multithreaded
env
PROTECTED]
www.css.ch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10.02.2003 13:00:56
Bitte antworten an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie:
Thema: RE: Antwort: Fop and multithreading.
Thanks for your help.
In addition, I'm in the same kind of situation as you are (multiprocessor
Unix box
Bitte antworten an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie:
Thema: RE: Antwort: Fop and multithreading.
The renderer I use is the PrintRenderer class found in the FopPrintServlet
example (this renderer extends the AWTRenderer).
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL
Frédéric and Reto,
having read the 24.1.2 Programming restrictions of the EJB 2.0
specification, I'd recommend you guys don't call FOP from an EJB. The
programming restrictions forbid among other things the following:
- Reading or writing of static variables (FOP still does this too often)
- Use
Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10.02.2003 14:08:11
Bitte antworten an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie:
Thema: Re: Antwort: Fop and multithreading.
Frédéric and Reto,
having read the 24.1.2 Programming restrictions of the EJB 2.0
specification, I'd
Thanks for your help
-Message d'origine-
De: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: lundi 10 février 2003 14:08
À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: Re: Antwort: Fop and multithreading.
Frédéric and Reto,
having read the 24.1.2 Programming restrictions of the EJB 2.0
specification, I'd
On 10.02.2003 16:15:48 reto.blunschi wrote:
I do agree very much with you about the concerns on EJB usage, though
unfortunately drop the EJB idea is not an option.
EJB is the chosen environment in this company (my client). Since XSL:FO has
also been chosen as strategic technology, we are
13 matches
Mail list logo
