Clay Leeds wrote:
IIRC, is ignored by FOP (or rather the XSL-FO spec indicates
it should be ignored).
I don't think so. There are ambiguities in the spec regarding ,
but it is certainly not to be ignored, and FOP 0.20.5rc1 and CVS handles it
probably correctly.
J.Pietschmann
--
IIRC, is ignored by FOP (or rather the XSL-FO spec indicates
it should be ignored). Wouldn't it be better to use this:
?
Müller, Markus wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> you can find several XSL:FO samples using a tag like to specify line
> breaks, using the template
> ...
>
>
>
>
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
$> Gesendet: Montag, 14. April 2003 10:37
$> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$> Betreff: Manual line breaks
$>
$>
$> Hello!
$>
$> In a perfect XML world content is always separatable from
$> presentation. Unfortunately, there are cases (at least in
$
I haven't tried this myself yet, but see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=102469565909328&w=2 :
'If you want to have your line breaks preserved, you
should set linefeed-treatment to preserve. Unfortunately,
FOP doesn't implement this. You can set white-space-collapse
to false, which will
Hello!
In a perfect XML world content is always separatable from
presentation. Unfortunately, there are cases (at least in
publishing) when this is simply not possible. For example, we need
to provide the possibility to insert manual breaks into text
(especially titles).
Web research tells me
