Title: RE: number-rows-spanned - Faster?
I have found nesting tables can be quite quick. If it is simple tables nest within another. If you get into nest 4, and 5 deep that is where there can be a slow down.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
Is it faster to nest my fo:tables or to use number-rows-spanned to
create more complicated tables?
I'd try nested tables first, cells spanning rows occasionally create
nasty problems at page breaks.
J.Pietschmann
Thanks for the warning, but I *shouldn't*
Clay Leeds wrote:
I'm still wondering, and you're probably the person to ask: is FOP
faster with spanned rows or nested tables.
I don't know. There is more code and data involved if a nested
table is used, a row spanning cell however may cause some sort
of backtracking. Probably you'll need to
Clay Leeds wrote:
Is it faster to nest my fo:tables or to use number-rows-spanned to
create more complicated tables?
I'd try nested tables first, cells spanning rows occasionally create
nasty problems at page breaks.
J.Pietschmann
Is it faster to nest my fo:tables or to use number-rows-spanned to
create more complicated tables?
--
Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com
PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc
