Irv Salisbury III wrote:
It seemed like most of the readers would read the image into memory.
So, one thought on an enhancement might be to always read
the bytes in from the URL and then just hand that off instead
of opening the URL again.
Of course, this doesn't allow for future
Victor Mote wrote:
Irv Salisbury III wrote:
It seemed like most of the readers would read the image into memory.
So, one thought on an "enhancement" might be to always read
the bytes in from the URL and then just hand that off instead
of opening the URL again.
Of course,
Hi,
I tried to check for a graphical environment before the 'transcode'
process using the piece of code Victor had provided (attached below). There
is infact a graphical environment available (the method returns true).
The statement ge =
On 21.01.2005 07:48:25 Saptarshi Sen wrote:
I tried to check for a graphical environment before the 'transcode'
process using the piece of code Victor had provided (attached below). There
is infact a graphical environment available (the method returns true).
The statement ge =
Can problems arise from mixing units? My page is defined in cm and images in
px.
Thanks,
Luke
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 21, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Luke Shannon wrote:
Can problems arise from mixing units? My page is defined in cm and
images in
px.
Thanks,
Luke
It should not be a problem to mix units. However, I've seen a number of
times recently when FOP developers indicate that pictures should never
be
Thanks. This might explain what I am seeing now.
- Original Message -
From: The Web Maestro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Mixing Units
On Jan 21, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Luke Shannon wrote:
Can problems arise from mixing units?
