Hi, all,
Here's the scoop:
* I am trying to get encryption to work in FOP.
* I am using Windows XP, Java 1.4.1_02, and FOP 0.20.5.
* I have downloaded bcprov-jdk14-125.jar from Bouncy Castle
and have put that jar file in fop-0.20.5\lib.
* I have modified build.bat to include the following
You were correct, Andreas.
Your first e-mail made me wonder if I had Java installed in more than one
place, and I do. I had modified the java.security file for the wrong one.
I have inherited this machine, and under a big enough time crunch that I
cannot wipe its drives and build it up as I wou
"recursively" is the answer. You need to write a recursive template that
you call when your style string contains a semi-colon (;). That template
then generates multiple elements until the style string runs
out of semi-colons.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/
Couple things: First, I'd dump this topic on the XSL list. Those folks
love this kind of question, and they are good at helping with this kind of
issue. Second, I'd look at making a key to hold the
field-that-has-a-value-and-whose-next-sibling-has-a-value combos. Then,
rather than read the whol
Forgot to add the URL for the XSL list:
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
robert frapples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/30/2004 03:09 PM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
setting up tables differently based on exi
>From all that I have read (and tried myself), you've just hit FOP in its
weakest spot. The only think I can suggest is to chunk your content such
that a table never crosses a page boundary. Hopefully, the new effort on
FOP (about which I know very little) will do better with keeps and breaks.
Just a thought - have you tried giving FOP more memory to use?
If you use the batch file, you can modify the line that invokes FOP to
include the -Xmx switch, so that it looks something like this:
java -Xmx512m -cp "%LOCALCLASSPATH%" org.apache.fop.apps.Fop %1 %2 %3 %4
%5 %6 %7 %8 %9
That give
Put them both in a table and set the keep-together property on both cells.
One of the limitations of 0.20.5 is that only tables support keeps.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(on contract at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
Sajeesh N Kakkat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/11/2005 03:47 AM
> What I don't understand is the relationship between columns and tables.
Well, the fo:table element requires one or more fo:table-column elements
as children. In other words, you have to remember that XSL:FO requires you
to specify the columns before you specify the table body. When you start
Assuming you have one-inch margins and a page with of 8.5 inches, the
following FO element draws a one-point black line across the page:
You can also set other properties, such as space-before and space-after.
Here's an example that I use for lines in footers (to separate the rest of
the page
My thought precisely.
Here is a fragment from a stylesheet I wrote to print books (for the
software industry):
The $showIndex variable gets populated at the top of the stylesheet, based
on an implied (and so not always present) attribute in the XML, thus:
Just a thought:
Did you set up the necessary font-metrics file? You can find an example
(called cid-fonts.fo) in the examples\fo\advanced (Windows) or
examples/fo/advanced (Linux or Unix) directory.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(on contract at Syngergistic Solution Technologies)
---
I was also taken aback by what seems to be a plug for RenderX. FOP does
all that I need, so I've never looked at RenderX, and this doesn't seem a
like a logical forum in which to plug a commercial product.
Unfortunately, while I have produced several large PDF files (my record so
far is a bit o
> Oh, it would be so cool if we could have our own PDF of the XSL
> 1.0 specification [1]. The official PDF was created by RenderX. I
> thought about doing a stylesheet for that myself but I'm currently
> so busy coding on FOP 1.0dev that I'd be more than happy if
> someone from the user commun
> Thanks! Success stories ([1] is my favorite)--as well
> as failures (honesty of its limitations also being
> helpful in increasing confidence in FOP)--are always
> welcome on this list.
Oh, you want success stories. That I can do.
I use FOP to produce all the documentation for a small software
Move the text-align property to the fo:block element (and you can then
remove the inline wrapper, since text-align is its only attribute).
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
"Jaysheel Bhavsar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/16/2005 02
Hi, Kai,
I would need a bit more detail to be able to help with that. Please post
the smallest (but still still complete) set of XML files (input and
desired output) that you want. That way, we can see what you mean.
A couple observations, though: You can't walk back up the tree from a
paramet
Hi, Kai,
I don't think you need to call a template for that. You can test for the
characteristics of the node from within the matching template and get the
image you need.
Several xsl:when statements within an xsl:choose block should let you
figure out which images to use when. For example,
Hi, Kai,
Here are two layouts of a file structure. (To appear correctly, they need
to be viewed with a monospace font.) Since I don't like to send images to
mailing lists, I have used text symbols as shown below:
Key:
|-A node that is not the last node at its level
-A node that is the last nod
Hi, Kai,
The following stylesheet, applied to the following XML (an extension of
your example), generates the same tree view as used by the Acrobat Reader
(at least in version 7):
XSL:
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
>
Test
<!--
Hi, Kai,
Well, perhaps the solution I just sent will be good enough. Maybe you can
say, "That's how Adobe does it," and get away with it...
If not, that left-most line will require a recursive template.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Techn
IPD = inline-progression-dimension
FOP is probably peeved because you didn't tell it how big to make the
columns. FOP doesn't automatically determine the size of columns.
If you can't figure it out pretty quickly from that info, send a code
listing (short as possible but that shows the problem)
That's an XSLT question rather than an XSL-FO question. XSLT can solve
this problem with the document function, thus:
Use a for-each to read each document spec in the configuration file. For
each doc spec, read the referenced document and copy it to the result
tree.
Something like this (assumi
If you are using static-content blocks to create headers and footers,
you'll automatically get that content on the new page. You can also put a
running title in the header or footer. If you make the header area big
enough and apply the same style choices to the running title, I suppose
you coul
Yes.
Use the xsl:result-document feature of XSL2 (which pretty much means using
Saxon 8 as your XSL processor) or use an extension function (check out
EXSLT for a good set of them). That lets you create multiple FO files from
one XSL file applied to one (or more) XML files. Then you can run FOP
DocBook will make a fine test case for the new FOP, though. If the
upcoming version can handle all the things that DocBook can do, it'll be a
truly excellent tool.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
"J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PRO
Why the change from xml.apache.org to xmlgraphics.apache.org?
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
What kind of output are you producing? What are you using to view it?
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/14/2005 09:56 AM
Please respond to
fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
To
"fop-u
Have you checked the RTF output? Does it contain the correct elements to
produce the border? If so, then this would be a JFOR problem. If not, then
it's a FOP problem. Given that you see the borders in a viewing
application but not when printed, I am inclined to suspect that the
problem comes f
ish the oversight that
the board requested.
I hope that answers it.
On 14.03.2005 16:38:27 JBryant wrote:
> Why the change from xml.apache.org to xmlgraphics.apache.org?
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
The following element in an FO file produces a border for me (in PDF):
Perhaps you tried
I can see where many processors would simply ignore the style and color
attributes in favor of the compound property. In that case, you'd have an
invisible border.
Disclaimer: I use FOP to create PDF
f we get some help
on the way, even better. hint, hint!
On 14.03.2005 17:54:04 JBryant wrote:
> I just don't want to see FOP lose its focus on implementing the XSL-FO
> spec and wander off into becoming some kind of oddball graphics
rendering
> engine for other purposes. The current
Since both the text preceding the nested block and the text following the
nested block are within the indented block, the text after the nested
block gets indented. You'd need to move the text after the nested block to
its own block to not have it be indented.
This is just for testing pu
My apologies. I had confused text-indent with start-indent.
I guess FOP has a bug here. The work around appears to be not having text
after a nested block.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
"Puppala, Kumar (LNG-DAY)" <[EMAIL
34 matches
Mail list logo
