RE: Which Batik version in FOP 0.20.3
Ok, thanks. -Thomas > -Original Message- > From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:28 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Which Batik version in FOP 0.20.3 > > Most likely if it works then they are compatible. > I can't remember if there where any changes between those > versions that > would cause problems. > > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 19:47, Vollmer, Thomas - CannonSA wrote: [snip] > > Keiron, can you confirm that for the purposes of > FOP/Batik-integration it > > makes > > no difference whether I use Batik 1.1 or Batik 1.1.1? > > > > Thanks, > > Thomas If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. You should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by nor attributable to ITT.
RE: Which Batik version in FOP 0.20.3
Most likely if it works then they are compatible. I can't remember if there where any changes between those versions that would cause problems. On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 19:47, Vollmer, Thomas - CannonSA wrote: > Thanks, Keiron. And here's a follow-up question... > > I'm trying to convert an SVG to PDF and had success with the following two > command lines: > > java -cp > "D:\Programs\fop-0.20.3\lib\batik.jar";"D:\Programs\batik-1.5\lib\crimson-pa > rser.jar";"D:\Programs\fop-0.20.3\build\fop.jar" > org.apache.batik.apps.rasterizer.Main -m application/pdf test.svg > > java -cp > "D:\Programs\batik-1.1.1\batik.jar";"D:\Programs\fop-0.20.3\build\fop.jar" > org.apache.batik.apps.rasterizer.Main -m application/pdf test.svg > > The first one uses the Batik that comes with FOP, which is 1.1 as I now > know. > The second one uses Batik 1.1.1 which also seems to work. > > Keiron, can you confirm that for the purposes of FOP/Batik-integration it > makes > no difference whether I use Batik 1.1 or Batik 1.1.1? > > Thanks, > Thomas
RE: Which Batik version in FOP 0.20.3
Thanks, Keiron. And here's a follow-up question... I'm trying to convert an SVG to PDF and had success with the following two command lines: java -cp "D:\Programs\fop-0.20.3\lib\batik.jar";"D:\Programs\batik-1.5\lib\crimson-pa rser.jar";"D:\Programs\fop-0.20.3\build\fop.jar" org.apache.batik.apps.rasterizer.Main -m application/pdf test.svg java -cp "D:\Programs\batik-1.1.1\batik.jar";"D:\Programs\fop-0.20.3\build\fop.jar" org.apache.batik.apps.rasterizer.Main -m application/pdf test.svg The first one uses the Batik that comes with FOP, which is 1.1 as I now know. The second one uses Batik 1.1.1 which also seems to work. Keiron, can you confirm that for the purposes of FOP/Batik-integration it makes no difference whether I use Batik 1.1 or Batik 1.1.1? Thanks, Thomas > -Original Message- > From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Which Batik version in FOP 0.20.3 > > > > It is version 1.1 > > There should be a readme in the lib directory but it appears > that it was > not included in that release. > Christian, will the readme file be in the next release? > I think it also needs to be updated with the versions of other jar > files. > > On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 02:53, Vollmer, Thomas - CannonSA wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm using FOP 0.20.3 and I'm wondering which version of > > Batik (fop-0.20.3\lib\batik.jar) it comes with exactly. > > > > Can anyone provide some insight? > > > > Thanks, > > Thomas If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. You should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by nor attributable to ITT.
Re: Which Batik version in FOP 0.20.3
It is version 1.1 There should be a readme in the lib directory but it appears that it was not included in that release. Christian, will the readme file be in the next release? I think it also needs to be updated with the versions of other jar files. On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 02:53, Vollmer, Thomas - CannonSA wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using FOP 0.20.3 and I'm wondering which version of > Batik (fop-0.20.3\lib\batik.jar) it comes with exactly. > > Can anyone provide some insight? > > Thanks, > Thomas
