Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-22 Thread John Austin
On Thursday 18 April 2002 20:15, you wrote: > Hi, > My manager just nixed the use of FOP in our project for the following > reason. > a) Its only up to 0.20.3 meaning an early beta. > b) He is under the understanding partly based on what he saw on the > FOP site that the code is being rewritten fro

RE: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-20 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
> > My manager just nixed the use of FOP in our project for the following > > reason. > > a) Its only up to 0.20.3 meaning an early beta. > > b) He is under the understanding partly based on what he saw on > the FOP site > > that the code is being rewritten from scratch and he therefore > does

Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
> My manager just nixed the use of FOP in our project for the following > reason. > a) Its only up to 0.20.3 meaning an early beta. That doesn't mean too much. A lot of poeple are using FOP in a production environment. True, you may have to work around one or another problem, but FOP is useful en

Betreff: Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread Stephan Wiesner
---Original-Nachricht--- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Datum: Freitag, 19. April 2002 04:51:25 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete? I'm currently using a XSL sheet based on this one, however, it is not very robust. A more complete XSL sheet would be great. Pa

Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread Patrick Lanphier
http://www.w3.org/2001/08/01-XHTML-XSL/html.xsl > > > >From: Patrick Lanphier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete? > >Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:30:25 -

Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread L Rutker
also try: http://www.w3.org/2001/08/01-XHTML-XSL/html.xsl From: Patrick Lanphier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete? Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:30:25 -0400 (EDT) Could you share your XSL file fo

Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread Patrick Lanphier
basically a modified > subset of the antenna house one. > > Lou > > >From: Patrick Lanphier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete? > >Date: Thu, 1

Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread L Rutker
house one. Lou From: Patrick Lanphier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete? Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:30:25 -0400 (EDT) Could you share your XSL file for XHTML->PDF you have developed for FOP? T

Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread Patrick Lanphier
anymore. I need to convince > him that it will be viable for the long run and will not constantly change > etc. > > Lou > > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Refactoring / Rewritin

Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread L Rutker
viable for the long run and will not constantly change etc. Lou From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete? Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:19:17 -0700 Take an example from the /docs/examples and show him how easy it

Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread Patrick Lanphier

Re: Refactoring / Rewriting of FOP? Obsolete?

2002-04-19 Thread Naveen_Rojanala
Take an example from the /docs/examples and show him how easy it is to output into pdf files. naveen "L Rutker"