Re: PDFTranscoder custom fonts

Hi, Yes it now works fine. Thanks for that Antonio Broughton Jeremias Maerki wrote: > You did everything correctly. The problem was that this functionality > got broken during the last few months and you're the first to notice. > I've fixed it: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428137&view=rev >

Re: PDFTranscoder custom fonts

You did everything correctly. The problem was that this functionality got broken during the last few months and you're the first to notice. I've fixed it: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428137&view=rev We should really automate some tests for things like that but it's a little difficult to write

Re: Table-footer breaking across page

An example FO file (not XSLT) that demonstrates the problem would be welcome. Thanks. On 27.07.2006 22:08:39 DenisP wrote: > I have a 3 row table footer that I want to appear at the bottom of the > table content. The table runs over 3 pages. The header repeats on each > page but I have put in

Re: FOP 0.20.5 versus FOP 0.92 performance

On Aug 2, 2006, at 19:37, Donald Mackinnon wrote: Hi, I have generated large PDF reports on a Solaris 10 server running Java 1.5.0_01 for FOP release 0.20.5 and 0.92 Beta and findings are as follows: First of all: thanks for sharing your findings. Always interesting to get feedback on perfo

Re: FOP 0.20.5 versus FOP 0.92 performance

Thanks for sharing these results with us. When I did some benchmarks about 11 months ago the performance was slightly in favor of the new code. In the meantime, new functionality has come in and it could be that some of the changes may have had a negative impact on performance. However, performance

FOP 0.20.5 versus FOP 0.92 performance

Hi   I have generated large PDF reports on a Solaris 10 server running Java 1.5.0_01 for FOP release 0.20.5 and 0.92 Beta and findings are as follows:-   1)  FOP 0.92 Beta appears to be freeing up memory rapidly after .pdf generation whereas FOP 0.20.5 does not.   2)  FOP 0.92 Beta ap

Re: Disappearing table-header

> I've just been able to fix the bug. It was indeed something different > from what I fixed in May although with the same symptom. Your test file > now shows the table headers as it should. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428011&view=rev > Thanks very much, I have downloaded the last versi

Re: latest build

Should be fixed now: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428037&view=rev I hope you managed to compile Barcode4J in the meantime, so you can use the FOP extension instead of working with pregenerated PNG images. That will be much more efficient. On 27.07.2006 15:59:06 Rick Roen wrote: > I downloaded

Re: Disappearing table-header

I've just been able to fix the bug. It was indeed something different from what I fixed in May although with the same symptom. Your test file now shows the table headers as it should. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428011&view=rev On 25.07.2006 05:34:41 Gilles Beaugeais wrote: > > > > Sorry to

Re: Problem with java virtual machine from ibm

Danelaw wrote: the fo files generated with xalan are different, but i dont know why they are different :S Most likely because the JDK comes bundled with xerces and xalan. Sun bundles a different version to IBM. Probably best to place the version of xalan and xerces shipped with FOP and copy

Re: Problem with java virtual machine from ibm

the fo files generated with xalan are different, but i dont know why they are different :S i am searching for incorrect br or something like this . On 8/2/06, Pascal Sancho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Danelaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hello, i am crea

Re: [docbook] name space?

hi (slt) PS,   thank you for your help. i made a mistake by searshing "docbook" instead of "bookmark". i'am going to upgrade my old version because i have a lot of  probleme with it.   thank's.   2006/8/2, Pascal Sancho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi MOAV,> -Original Message-> From: mahmoudi ould

RE: Problem with java virtual machine from ibm

> -Original Message- > From: Danelaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hello, i am creating a pdf using xsl and xml, if i do it with > java from sun it works well with 5 pages (header and 2 lines > per page the last page has 8 lines) and if i do with java > from ibm it works bad, with 15 p

RE: [docbook] name space?

Hi MOAV, > -Original Message- > From: mahmoudi ould abdel vetah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > i user fox extension in fop 0.20.5 version. now i want to > upgrade to 0.91 one, so i have to use docbook instead of fox. Can't you directly upgrade to the latest release (FOP 0.92b)? > but

Fwd: Problem with java virtual machine from ibm

Hello, i am creating a pdf using xsl and xml, if i do it with java from sun it works well with 5 pages (header and 2 lines per page the last page has 8 lines) and if i do with java from ibm it works bad, with 15 pages (header and 1 line per pages) any idea of what thing or option can be? i can att

Problem with java virtual machine from ibm

Hello, i am creating a pdf using xsl and xml, if i do it with java from sun it works well with 5 pages (header and 2 lines per page the last page has 8 lines) and if i do with java from ibm it works bad, with 15 pages (header and 1 line per pages) any idea of what thing or option can be? i can att

[docbook] name space?

hi,   i user fox extension in fop 0.20.5 version. now i want to upgrade to 0.91 one, so i have to use docbook instead of fox. but for fox i have this name space :   -xmlns:fox="http://xml.apache.org/fop/extensions"   what name space, i have to put in place to use docbook?   thank's.