Re: FOP 1.0 - LengthRangeProperty checkConsistency

2011-01-13 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 05:35:28PM -0500, Benoit, Frederick C. wrote: I am using StylusStudio which the Xalan processor, FOP 1.0 validation XSD and FOP 1.0 post-processor to render a PDF. I've been working my way through various validation errors over the past few days, but now I'm stuck on

Re: FOP Trunk Snapshot (fop-20110110.jar) : barcode4j

2011-01-13 Thread Simon Pepping
Why does this cause an error? I see no problem in barcode's method BarcodeElementMapping.initialize. In eclipse I can compile barcode without errors with FOP from before your latest fix. Simon On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:01:45PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Thanks for noticing. This was broken

Re: FOP Trunk Snapshot (fop-20110110.jar) : barcode4j

2011-01-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Yes, you can probably recompile, but the change violated binary backwards-compatibility. I've put the comment there precisely because of that reason. I've had to revert the same change once before. On 13.01.2011 11:01:15 Simon Pepping wrote: Why does this cause an error? I see no problem in

Antialising issue with borders in PDF with fop-0.95

2011-01-13 Thread Juergen Birkle
Hi, when generating a table in PDF with FOP and XML the borders of the table appear in different width on the Screen (even with different PDF viewers!). I was searching the web and this forum and found the following Question in this forum:

Re: Rendering differences: fop-0.95 vs fop.-1.0

2011-01-13 Thread Rob Sargent
On 01/12/2011 05:43 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Rob, On 11/01/11 13:20, Rob Sargent wrote: I've proven to myself that I'm generating identical xml, but getting malformed pdf in version 1.0 where 0.95 was perfectly happy. I'm getting some clipping along the inner (left) side of

Re: Rendering differences: fop-0.95 vs fop.-1.0

2011-01-13 Thread Rob Sargent
On 01/13/2011 11:42 AM, Rob Sargent wrote: On 01/12/2011 05:43 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Rob, On 11/01/11 13:20, Rob Sargent wrote: I've proven to myself that I'm generating identical xml, but getting malformed pdf in version 1.0 where 0.95 was perfectly happy. I'm

Re: Antialising issue with borders in PDF with fop-0.95

2011-01-13 Thread Peter Hancock
Hi Juergen, What does a print of the pdf look like? It may be the viewer (as mentioned in the post you referenced) that is responsible for anti-aliasing the pdf for screen display, and may not be a good representation of the print. Currently FOP draw each of the 4 border sections of a cell

Re: Rendering differences: fop-0.95 vs fop.-1.0

2011-01-13 Thread Rob Sargent
On 01/13/2011 11:44 AM, Rob Sargent wrote: On 01/13/2011 11:42 AM, Rob Sargent wrote: On 01/12/2011 05:43 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Rob, On 11/01/11 13:20, Rob Sargent wrote: I've proven to myself that I'm generating identical xml, but getting